Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "UMD President's serious plagiarism comes to light"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This dude literally came out and said, "this is normal recurrent use of language in science." This is so absurd and basically takes a big peepee all over the scientific method and academic research. That alone should be clear evidence that he isn't qualified to be president of a research university[/quote] Show me where he said “normal”[/quote] Saying “not uncommon” is basically the same thing as saying normal. Because yes, this level of plagiarism most certainly IS UNCOMMON and would get your article retracted at any respectable academic journal https://kcby.com/news/nation-world/university-of-maryland-rejects-plagiarism-accusation-against-school-president-college-park-joshua-altmann-umd-darryll-pines-australian-higher-education-academia-umd-dc-college-uni-dissertation[/quote] We do use boiler plate language for documents so makes sense. [/quote] Lawyers use boilerplate language in contracts and laws, and largely public domain via government. (But there is some controversial intellectual property practices around copyrighting the text of laes and standards). But those are functional works, not creative expressive works. Contract writers don't sign their name to the work. A research paper is claimed to be an original work by an author. When a different author writes 1/3 the paper, their name should be on it. When you spend hours copying someone else's work and changing the spelling of words, and don't give credit, simultaneously claiming that work is so meaningless that it doesn't deserve credit, but so meaningful that you'd send hours to carefully merge kt into your work, that's simply depraved. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics