Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Why was Michael Jackson not completely cancelled?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I don't find the accusations from the current 2 to be compelling, sorry. One of them was a family friend of the Jacksons that started his accusations after the Jacksons refused to cast him in a lead role in the Cirque du Soleil show. The other accuser joined the lawsuit after his mother had a 6-figure legal judgement against her. Both of their stories had inconsistencies that made me question the whole thing. One claimed that Jackson gave him the red Thriller jacket as payment to keep quiet about the alleged abuse. It was found to have never been in this man's possession. He claimed that as soon as he turned 14, Jackson "banished" him from his life and he never spoke to him again, as he "aged out". But pictures and videos of Neverland show him being at Jackson's property well into adulthood. One accuser said Jackson wouldn't "allow" him to interact with girls and he had to promise to never have a girlfriend, because it would make Jackson "jealous". But the accuser had a long-time girlfriend of 8 years during the alleged abuse period, who publicly gave an interview saying he was being untruthful. The filmmaker also had a history of stretching claims about the 9/11 attacks in his prior documentaries. I don't know. It's not beyond a reasonable doubt to me. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics