Anonymous wrote:He didn’t see anything wrong with sharing a bed because he grew up with nine brothers and sisters in a 2 bedroom house.
Michael had plenty of mental health issues especially body dysmorphia but I tend to believe he was more asexual than pedophilic.
His supposed bio kids were not his. He didn’t sleep with Debbie.
I think he mentally thought he was still a kid and didn’t have sexual desire for either women, men, or kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I see an argument about not supporting an artist you otherwise admire if said support would contribute to him monetarily, Michael Jackson is dead. Buying every song he ever made ten times each would not contribute to supporting him in any way.
Someone can be a terrible person, a criminal, a monster and still make great art. I do not get canceling the art with the artist especially if said artist can’t benefit from it. I judge art, music, and things in general on whether I like it, not whether its creator comports with my morals. Are we going to cancel Apple products because Steve Jobs who’s now dead was a jerk?
His estate which holds the rights to his catalogue still profits from his image and music.
So, his children. If he was really as pedophile, as you say, it's probably good that they benefit from his image and music. What's the issue here?
It shouldn’t be his children either. His victims should receive compensation through the royalties.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I see an argument about not supporting an artist you otherwise admire if said support would contribute to him monetarily, Michael Jackson is dead. Buying every song he ever made ten times each would not contribute to supporting him in any way.
Someone can be a terrible person, a criminal, a monster and still make great art. I do not get canceling the art with the artist especially if said artist can’t benefit from it. I judge art, music, and things in general on whether I like it, not whether its creator comports with my morals. Are we going to cancel Apple products because Steve Jobs who’s now dead was a jerk?
His estate which holds the rights to his catalogue still profits from his image and music.
So, his children. If he was really as pedophile, as you say, it's probably good that they benefit from his image and music. What's the issue here?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do people watch Woody Allen and Roman Polanski films? They do.
I find the Woody Allen thing conflicting. Most of the negativity around him comes from Mia. Mia had plenty of her own problems. Several of her adopted kids are dead, several have accused her of abuse, and not all the kids support Dylan and her accusations against Allen. What is the truth? Nobody knows.
Well we do know he married his adopted daughter, so, that's enough for me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I see an argument about not supporting an artist you otherwise admire if said support would contribute to him monetarily, Michael Jackson is dead. Buying every song he ever made ten times each would not contribute to supporting him in any way.
Someone can be a terrible person, a criminal, a monster and still make great art. I do not get canceling the art with the artist especially if said artist can’t benefit from it. I judge art, music, and things in general on whether I like it, not whether its creator comports with my morals. Are we going to cancel Apple products because Steve Jobs who’s now dead was a jerk?
His estate which holds the rights to his catalogue still profits from his image and music.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do people watch Woody Allen and Roman Polanski films? They do.
I find the Woody Allen thing conflicting. Most of the negativity around him comes from Mia. Mia had plenty of her own problems. Several of her adopted kids are dead, several have accused her of abuse, and not all the kids support Dylan and her accusations against Allen. What is the truth? Nobody knows.
Anonymous wrote:When the FBI did a no-knock raid on his house when he was in Europe, he reportedly got so upset that he trashed his hotel room. They went through years of hard drives, internet history, security cameras, and hidden compartments in his home. What did they find? Absolutely nothing. He was exonerated when he was alive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He’s been deceased for a long time and we had the me too movement. No matter whether he did or didn’t sexually assault kids he had an inappropriate relationship with them. Why are people still fans/ his music regularly plays on the radio?
B/c he was a black gay male (and pedophile) who in the Left’s hierarchy of victimhood ranked above his victims. Kind of like OJ and why NOW did not go after him. Vote Kamala (if you are high).
Anonymous wrote:He’s been deceased for a long time and we had the me too movement. No matter whether he did or didn’t sexually assault kids he had an inappropriate relationship with them. Why are people still fans/ his music regularly plays on the radio?