Reply to Official Trump VP thread

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Official Trump VP thread "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't think he could bring himself to pick a woman. [/quote]

A woman would be the right choice though. That's where he's weakest.

Elise Stefanik would be a good choice. She's bright. She's sharp. She's a Trump loyalist. She's a lot quicker and more informed than Kamala Harris. She's a more plausible potential president. And she's a shiny new thing for most people.

Kristi Noem might have worked. Telegenic governor. Trump loyalist. Married with three daughters. But like almost every woman associated with the Trump White House, she reportedly had an affair with Corey Lewandowski, a slimy operative who seems to have singlehandedly destroyed the political futures of at least a dozen republican women.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders doesn't change anyone's vote. She'd be competent though. No small thing in Trump world. And she's comfortable with the press, which is important to Trump. Could do worse.

Worse would be Kari Lake. Genuinely nuts.

[/quote]

How is Sarah Sanders, a first term nepo-governor, qualified?
How is Stefanik, who is only a US rep, qualified?[/quote]

How is a game show host who managed to bankrupt two casinos qualified? And faced multiple sexual assault charges? And multiple fraud charges? And wears more makeup than a drag queen? And has five children with three different baby mommas? And was besties with Jeffrey Epstein? And has numerous ties to Russian oligarchs? And whose father was a member of the KKK? And who has been sued thousands of times for failure to pay his bills? And who has a gold toilet? And who has been bankrupt three times?

The bar is very, very low.

Sarah Sanders held her own as press secretary under Trump - no small thing. That is a difficult job.

Stefanik, a Harvard grad, is sharp. She absolutely devastated the university presidents at those hearings. And she was smart enough to stand back and let them destroy themselves. Clever. Wouldn't want to debate her.[/quote]

Stefanik is a racist nut job who backed Trump’s claim about voter fraud. She’s intellectually dishonest, and only cares for herself (since her funding more than tripled when she hung her hat w Trump). [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics