Anonymous wrote:Kristi Noem - able, articulate, attractive. Republicans will keep the White House for at least a dozen years if she is the VP candidate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump picks people based primarily on looks so you have to consider that when coming up with a list.

Prove me wrong.

All the people listed so far are conventionally attractive.

Trump doesn't like overweight people, especially women.

He also wants people to look the part like he thinks they look on tv or the movies. He would never think a dark-skinned person looks the part of VP.

Are you his therapist? How do you know this? Sounds like you are projecting your own biases.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kristi Noem - able, articulate, attractive. Republicans will keep the White House for at least a dozen years if she is the VP candidate.

I don't see this happening, because of the Corey Lewandowski factor.

Anonymous wrote:Kristi Noem - able, articulate, attractive. Republicans will keep the White House for at least a dozen years if she is the VP candidate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't think he could bring himself to pick a woman.

A woman would be the right choice though. That's where he's weakest.

Elise Stefanik would be a good choice. She's bright. She's sharp. She's a Trump loyalist. She's a lot quicker and more informed than Kamala Harris. She's a more plausible potential president. And she's a shiny new thing for most people.

Kristi Noem might have worked. Telegenic governor. Trump loyalist. Married with three daughters. But like almost every woman associated with the Trump White House, she reportedly had an affair with Corey Lewandowski, a slimy operative who seems to have singlehandedly destroyed the political futures of at least a dozen republican women.

Sarah Huckabee Sanders doesn't change anyone's vote. She'd be competent though. No small thing in Trump world. And she's comfortable with the press, which is important to Trump. Could do worse.

Worse would be Kari Lake. Genuinely nuts.

How is Sarah Sanders, a first term nepo-governor, qualified?
How is Stefanik, who is only a US rep, qualified?

How is a game show host who managed to bankrupt two casinos qualified? And faced multiple sexual assault charges? And multiple fraud charges? And wears more makeup than a drag queen? And has five children with three different baby mommas? And was besties with Jeffrey Epstein? And has numerous ties to Russian oligarchs? And whose father was a member of the KKK? And who has been sued thousands of times for failure to pay his bills? And who has a gold toilet? And who has been bankrupt three times?

The bar is very, very low.

Sarah Sanders held her own as press secretary under Trump - no small thing. That is a difficult job.

Stefanik, a Harvard grad, is sharp. She absolutely devastated the university presidents at those hearings. And she was smart enough to stand back and let them destroy themselves. Clever. Wouldn't want to debate her.

Anonymous wrote:Lauren Boebert.
She’ll bring Colorado on a platter.

Anonymous wrote:Vivek!

Anonymous wrote:It's tricky. He's got to pick somebody that will help him get some votes this fall, but if elected will then disappear and not be seen positioning for 2028 (he can't stand not being the center of attention). He'd be a lame duck on day #1, and it's going to become increasingly clear that with the threat of running for President gone, he'll rapidly become less and less relevant.

Anonymous wrote:People are saying Tucker Carlson

Anonymous wrote:Podcast and overall media darling, Megan Kelly?