Reply to No karma for OW

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "No karma for OW "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]She needs to blame her husband not the OW.  If it wasn't this woman, it would have been someone else.  Husband is 100% to blame.[/quote]

+1[/quote]

Yeah that's been said 1,000 times.  Yes,  she was just a warm hole and any OW would suffice.  She's not that special, it could have been anyone.  She's the one that opened her legs easily.[/quote]

Get a life, lady. You're obviously posting this "warm hole" and "open legs" stuff repeatedly and it is pathetic.

Every time one of these threads comes up about some AP/OW there are these psycho losers crawling out of the woodwork to call her easy, slutty, whatever. So what? Your husband went for it. He's easy. He's a slut. It may feel easier to focus (obsess) on the woman involved, but it takes two to tango and your greasy husband is the one who betrayed your marriage and promises HE made to you, not the woman.

[/quote]

Actually you're right about the husband. He's no good and imo used up goods at that point. Still many DWs have to stay for finances, kids, etc. Maybe health reasons, I've seen it all. The AP is a co-cheater, and also responsible for interjecting herself into a couples marriage. They are also responsible for the wrath of the DW, and the kids. Don't blame that pp for correctly calling the AP what she is. I call a bank robber/thief exactly what they are. Do you call them a over zealous withdrawer???
Sadly people are trying to deflect away from correct labeling. Maybe it's a harsh term, but nevertheless it's accurate.  Calling other posters psycho because you don't agree isn't winning your case fyi.[/quote]

You have a single data point on OW's sex life - you know that she had sex with one person, who was married. That does not make her a slut, literally by its definition. You don't know how long she 'dated' the guy for before hooking up with him, so calling her easy seems to be a stretch, too. If he wined and dined her for months, is she still easy? I don't agree with OW's behavior but using gendered terms for promiscuity for the woman while glossing over the person who broke their vows and was sleeping with two people at the same time is sexist and absurd.

And I do think looking up your friend's husband's AP's house address and price is psycho. As is the level of obsession with the OWs from other women talking about her 'hole' with a large degree of fixation.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics