Reply to Giving in to DH's porn "needs" = Good Wife or Bad Wife?

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Giving in to DH's porn "needs" = Good Wife or Bad Wife?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=TheManWithAUsername][quote=Anonymous][quote=TheManWithAUsername][quote=Anonymous]Seriously?  [b]3 people[/b] actually agree that it is wrong for a married couple to film themselves having sex?[/quote]
Don't be so sure. She/they are all just "Anonymous."[/quote]

Good grief, dude!  Let it go!
***
Are you really that myopic, that you cannot imagine there are BILLIONS of people who have lived and died on this Earth who DISAGREE with your lifestyle?  and that, perhaps, three of them live in the DC area?[/quote]
False dichotomy. I'm sure there are many such people,* but that has nothing to do with my belief that there are sock puppets here.

And I didn't say those were sock puppets; I just noted that one can never be sure here. And yes, when multiple posters pop in, close together in time, saying very little but on the same side of an issue, I get suspicious. It's just a suspicion.

Given that you've written this much without saying anything horrific, I'm actually inclined to think you're not the nutcase I've dubbed "Margaret White," whom I don't doubt engaged in sock-puppeting.

But what do you care what I think? I was just reminding others that the assumption/belief that there are multiple posters is questionable. For all you know, the anonymous post to which I responded was mine.

* What is "[my] lifestyle," BTW?[/quote]

Ugh.  You're a slippery one, Mr. Man.

I don't know your particular lifestyle, because I don't know you, but whatever it is, I'm sure a huge slice of humanity disagrees with it.  Being flabbergasted that more than one person finds porn morally wrong, to the point of insisting only one (mentally unstable) DCUM poster actually holds that position, is a frustrating diversionary tactic to those of us who are ready and willing to engage in the actual topic at hand, rather than attacks on the supposed character of anonymous posters.

Whenever a debater goes straight for ad hominem attacks over substance, astute listeners would be right to question the strength of the debater's position.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics