Reply to Author's book publication cancelled after a tweet reporting on a WMATA employee eating on the metro

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Author's book publication cancelled after a tweet reporting on a WMATA employee eating on the metro"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]For those of you who think the employee was the problem:

Barry Hobson, the chief of staff for the Metro workers union — Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689 — said in a statement the Metro employee was taking her meal break while in transit from one assignment to another. The statement notes operators have "an average of 20 minutes to consume a meal and get to their next access point to ensure all buses and trains are on time, safe, and ready to serve the riding public.”

From the article posted by OP.[/quote]

Oh, if the metro UNION says so, we all must be wrong! I don't see how this is an issue outside of the culture now where everyone has to be offended all the time. Metro worker breaking Metro rules, rules which metro enforces (or used to enforce) arbitrarily anyway. Rather than hold metro employees to a higher standard, the internets seem to think a-ok here and the person pointing out the double-standard is the problem. Race wasn't an issue until the offended parties (including WaPo) made it one - it wasn't an issue for the woman pointing out the rule breaking.[/quote]

If you don’t like the way an employee is behaving, you contact the company. You don’t take that person’s picture without permission and then post it for all the world to see. I don’t know if it was racially motivated or not, but Ms. Tynes’ behavior was unethical, and I don’t blame the publisher for dropping her. She did this to herself. Her publisher is in the business of making money first and foremost, and no company wants to be associated with someone who will affect its profit margins.[/quote]

Counterpoint - People have been posting pictures of metro employees behaving badly for years and there is zero results because the union has a stranglehold on protecting its members. Publicly identifying is the ONLY way to hold metro accountable.

I do agree with you on the publisher - they're out to make money so their decisions are motivated solely by what sells books. To that end I'm sure someone will step forward and publish this woman's work - she is much more famous now and will likely end up being significantly better known because of this. But it just might not be with the company that had signed her up first.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics