Reply to Jen Hatmaker

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Jen Hatmaker"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]This discussion has taken a weird shift -

But since we’re here 
If we look at things biologically then it’s male and female. Chromosomes and all of that XX and XY. Associated with certain physical characteristics most of the time. I mean if males had the monopoly on facial hair then my waxing and bleaching bills could disappear, ha!

Still gender is something else, and what is “normal” shifts over time. Like there’s no  anatomical or biological reason females must wear “women’s clothing” of dresses. And society shifted and viola a woman wearing pants is no big deal. So if a male wears a dress, then again what’s the big deal? 
Or a male/man in a skirt is wrong but a male/man in a kilt is not only right but like super masculine. The slight differences in it all just seems silly sometimes.

I know some feel that biological females are the same as the social gender women. And can’t quite see how a biological female could feel that their preferred social gender aligns with that of the man gender or a messy mix of the two. Bur I don’t think there is anything inherently unbiblical about that view.

I wonder if we let go of the social gender discussion and went with the undeniable DNA biology, then females could hold tight every part of womanhood they enjoy without infringing on others or feeling erased. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics