Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is your regularly scheduled reminder that Jen had talked (at length) about her inflammation prior to her “peri menopause” branding, and that she was able to cure it with diet (Whole 30); not by shilling pills. But apparently she couldn’t make money by that…

And also, that was a lie. She had plastic surgery. A tummy tuck and had her breast implants redone, and liposuction. Her bikini pictures she posted were all after her “dieting and clean eating work”. Eye rolls people don’t be dumb.

I was talking about a blog post from 2017. She complained about her constant inflammation and then detailed how the whole 30 cured it.

In the recent bikini pics she claimed she ate “a few more” vegetables and had “a few less” drinks. It was OBVIOUS that was all plastic surgery. The fact that she thought anyone would be believe her is crazy.

Anonymous wrote:Her language has gone from being a bit "spicy" ( I hate the term but it fits here) to sounding rough and crude. She is looking that way too. You get the feeling once she decided Christian mom was not her identity anymore that she just wants to bail on the whole thing. Her posts about kids and school used to have some underlying affection and warmth imo. Now she just sounds harsh. I hope for her sake she can realize that though she is divorced from her husband that she remains a mother and needs to prioritize her children before they all drift away

Just gross of her to be pushing this. She has a senior in high school one that she wasn’t even home for during her 1st week of school.

Anonymous wrote:This is your regularly scheduled reminder that Jen had talked (at length) about her inflammation prior to her “peri menopause” branding, and that she was able to cure it with diet (Whole 30); not by shilling pills. But apparently she couldn’t make money by that…

And also, that was a lie. She had plastic surgery. A tummy tuck and had her breast implants redone, and liposuction. Her bikini pictures she posted were all after her “dieting and clean eating work”. Eye rolls people don’t be dumb.

This is your regularly scheduled reminder that Jen had talked (at length) about her inflammation prior to her “peri menopause” branding, and that she was able to cure it with diet (Whole 30); not by shilling pills. But apparently she couldn’t make money by that…

Her language has gone from being a bit "spicy" ( I hate the term but it fits here) to sounding rough and crude. She is looking that way too. You get the feeling once she decided Christian mom was not her identity anymore that she just wants to bail on the whole thing. Her posts about kids and school used to have some underlying affection and warmth imo. Now she just sounds harsh. I hope for her sake she can realize that though she is divorced from her husband that she remains a mother and needs to prioritize her children before they all drift away

How do these companies reach out and ask her to spokesperson for them? She has red, sun damaged skin and she's hawking skincare? She looks bloated but a wellness company wants her to shill it? They picked the wrong woman

Her latest post about just go back to school. I recognize that the emails and added to lists and questions and forms blah blah are a fairly new phenomenon. But her “just go back to school” reeks of I Am Done don’t bother me with this sh#t I just want to be left alone until kid graduates and I don’t have to deal with this or her.

Know her life has gone in a different direction than she planned, but you pursued these kids, open arms, this is what God has led us to blah blah, only to want to ditch it when it becomes inconvenient. Geez.

The entire “gender is a social construct” argument is dumb. A social construct does not nullify basic biology.

If a man wants to wear a dress, I could not possibly care any less. Wear whatever you want. Paint your nails. Color your hair. Wear makeup. No one is arguing against this.

The real issue is - a man putting on a dress does not, in any way, shape, or form, give him the right to watch women undress in locker rooms. Period.
A boy wearing a dress does not, in any way, shape, or form, allow him to compete against my daughter in sports. Period.

The fact that there are WOMEN arguing in support of these men and boys is astounding.
Feminism is dead.

This discussion has taken a weird shift -

But since we’re here
If we look at things biologically then it’s male and female. Chromosomes and all of that XX and XY. Associated with certain physical characteristics most of the time. I mean if males had the monopoly on facial hair then my waxing and bleaching bills could disappear, ha!

Still gender is something else, and what is “normal” shifts over time. Like there’s no anatomical or biological reason females must wear “women’s clothing” of dresses. And society shifted and viola a woman wearing pants is no big deal. So if a male wears a dress, then again what’s the big deal?
Or a male/man in a skirt is wrong but a male/man in a kilt is not only right but like super masculine. The slight differences in it all just seems silly sometimes.

I know some feel that biological females are the same as the social gender women. And can’t quite see how a biological female could feel that their preferred social gender aligns with that of the man gender or a messy mix of the two. Bur I don’t think there is anything inherently unbiblical about that view.

I wonder if we let go of the social gender discussion and went with the undeniable DNA biology, then females could hold tight every part of womanhood they enjoy without infringing on others or feeling erased.

And reduced to an effin costume!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hatmaker-adjacent, but Howerton is back to occasionally shilling, and this week it was for Thinx period underpants. In the entire ad, there is no mentioning of female, daughter, etc. It's just "teens." What is it with the woke mob wanting to erase women?
She could have easily said, as the mom of two teen daughters, I know the challenge of finding comfortable period products....
But it's like she intentionally leaves out the fact that only women menstruate.
What stupid, stupid times we live in.

YES. This new progressive feminism is GARBAGE. Let’s destigmatize periods? Is that actually a problem? How about we keep men out of our locker rooms, Kristen?!

Can you imagine 10 years ago that womanhood in its clearest and most beautiful meaning would be systematically erased by modern feminism? We truly live in idiotic times.

Anonymous wrote:Hatmaker-adjacent, but Howerton is back to occasionally shilling, and this week it was for Thinx period underpants. In the entire ad, there is no mentioning of female, daughter, etc. It's just "teens." What is it with the woke mob wanting to erase women?
She could have easily said, as the mom of two teen daughters, I know the challenge of finding comfortable period products....
But it's like she intentionally leaves out the fact that only women menstruate.
What stupid, stupid times we live in.

YES. This new progressive feminism is GARBAGE. Let’s destigmatize periods? Is that actually a problem? How about we keep men out of our locker rooms, Kristen?!

Tiffany Jenkins does seem like she's split but is trying to avoid talking about it, kind of like Jen threw out the fish hook of "We're in crisis" and then danced around it in vague terms until finally lowering the divorce boom.

I’ve been under the impression that Tiffany Jenkins and her husband have already split up.

My next bet for a split is Meredith Masony and then Tiffany Jenkins.