Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Epstein Files"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://x.com/aidnmclaughlin/status/2005675297799303354?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg[/twitter][/quote] You do understand that there are names that are not necessarily perps? The docs being released include valid material and much that is hearsay. One reporter was complaining because her name was in there on a commercial flight log. Turns out she had booked a flight for an accuser. So, even though she was not involved in the dirty activity, she is in the files. There is lots in the files that is not defamatory on its face, but being in the file is making people think otherwise.[/quote] The journalist didn't do anything wrong, yet her name was unredacted in the release. Meanwhile from the releases we can see instances where names of people who are specifically mentioned as being involved with Epstein in the wrongdoing ARE redacted. That's a problem. They ARE covering for criminals. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
