Anonymous wrote:Tell me again why Biden and Obama didn't release earlier.

Can we pick some date when we stop spoon-feeding ignorant people information?

This has been explained to you time and time again, don’t you feel bad about that?

No shame at all?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:over 600 files that referenced trump have been removed from the database.

The cover up is in full swing

This is also evidence that Bondi and the DOJ are not in compliance with the court order and need to be held in contempt.

I have no idea why Ro Khanna and Massie didn’t have the impeachment charges ready to go, they had to know that they weren’t going to comply.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You do understand that there are names that are not necessarily perps?
The docs being released include valid material and much that is hearsay.

One reporter was complaining because her name was in there on a commercial flight log. Turns out she had booked a flight for an accuser. So, even though she was not involved in the dirty activity, she is in the files.

There is lots in the files that is not defamatory on its face, but being in the file is making people think otherwise.

I’m not sure anyone cares, much like the men didn’t care about the girls they hurt. But yes, the world knows that men’s reputations are more valuable than girls’ lives.

You do understand that it is a fu**ing nightmare that Trump’s department of justice in 2020 was tracking the movements of the one reporter who had actually uncovered most of the Epstein story?

Holy hell. It is truly chilling to learn that Trump assigned federal assets to surveil and spy on journalists for merely looking into the Epstein story.

Yes, but you have to understand that there was "nothing there." of course, if there was nothing to see, they'd be surveiling a reporter who was looking at it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You do understand that there are names that are not necessarily perps?
The docs being released include valid material and much that is hearsay.

One reporter was complaining because her name was in there on a commercial flight log. Turns out she had booked a flight for an accuser. So, even though she was not involved in the dirty activity, she is in the files.

There is lots in the files that is not defamatory on its face, but being in the file is making people think otherwise.

I’m not sure anyone cares, much like the men didn’t care about the girls they hurt. But yes, the world knows that men’s reputations are more valuable than girls’ lives.

You do understand that it is a fu**ing nightmare that Trump’s department of justice in 2020 was tracking the movements of the one reporter who had actually uncovered most of the Epstein story?

Holy hell. It is truly chilling to learn that Trump assigned federal assets to surveil and spy on journalists for merely looking into the Epstein story.

Anonymous wrote:over 600 files that referenced trump have been removed from the database.

The cover up is in full swing

link??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You do understand that there are names that are not necessarily perps?
The docs being released include valid material and much that is hearsay.

One reporter was complaining because her name was in there on a commercial flight log. Turns out she had booked a flight for an accuser. So, even though she was not involved in the dirty activity, she is in the files.

There is lots in the files that is not defamatory on its face, but being in the file is making people think otherwise.

I’m not sure anyone cares, much like the men didn’t care about the girls they hurt. But yes, the world knows that men’s reputations are more valuable than girls’ lives.

You do understand that it is a fu**ing nightmare that Trump’s department of justice in 2020 was tracking the movements of the one reporter who had actually uncovered most of the Epstein story?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

If trump never went to the island or was on the Lolita Express then how does Trump know his friends were there?

Except now we know that Trump DID fly on the Lolita Express, multiple times in fact. Including a trip that was just Epstein, Trump and a redacted 20-year-old woman, who wasn't of an age to correspond with any of Trump's kids because in 1993 Tiffany was a newborn and Ivanka was 11 or 12 years old.

https://newrepublic.com/post/204727/trump-flew-epstein-jet-20-year-old-woman-doj-files

Also, at the time that all this stuff was going on with Epstein, people seem to have forgotten that Trump didn't even need to fly on the Lolita Express in the first place. Trump had jets of his own and could have gone to visit Epstein on the island any time he wanted.

I would not underestimate the impact of MTG turning on Trump. True believer conservatives are appalled with Trump and Bondi. The Epstein case is wrecking the Republican Party in ways that liberals and progressives don't even understand bc that's not their world. But among conservatives, this is all a very big deal.

Anonymous wrote:

If trump never went to the island or was on the Lolita Express then how does Trump know his friends were there?

Anonymous wrote:over 600 files that referenced trump have been removed from the database.

The cover up is in full swing

This is also evidence that Bondi and the DOJ are not in compliance with the court order and need to be held in contempt.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You do understand that there are names that are not necessarily perps?
The docs being released include valid material and much that is hearsay.

One reporter was complaining because her name was in there on a commercial flight log. Turns out she had booked a flight for an accuser. So, even though she was not involved in the dirty activity, she is in the files.

There is lots in the files that is not defamatory on its face, but being in the file is making people think otherwise.

The journalist didn't do anything wrong, yet her name was unredacted in the release.
Meanwhile from the releases we can see instances where names of people who are specifically mentioned as being involved with Epstein in the wrongdoing ARE redacted.

That's a problem. They ARE covering for criminals.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You do understand that there are names that are not necessarily perps?
The docs being released include valid material and much that is hearsay.

One reporter was complaining because her name was in there on a commercial flight log. Turns out she had booked a flight for an accuser. So, even though she was not involved in the dirty activity, she is in the files.

There is lots in the files that is not defamatory on its face, but being in the file is making people think otherwise.

I’m not sure anyone cares, much like the men didn’t care about the girls they hurt. But yes, the world knows that men’s reputations are more valuable than girls’ lives.

Anonymous wrote:

You do understand that there are names that are not necessarily perps?
The docs being released include valid material and much that is hearsay.

One reporter was complaining because her name was in there on a commercial flight log. Turns out she had booked a flight for an accuser. So, even though she was not involved in the dirty activity, she is in the files.

There is lots in the files that is not defamatory on its face, but being in the file is making people think otherwise.

Anonymous wrote:over 600 files that referenced trump have been removed from the database.

The cover up is in full swing

Were these references that were missed in the first round of review? Does anyone know the context?

Just curious. Since this isn’t being covered much in the regular press and I don’t know which smaller sites to trust, I tend to come here to keep up with developments….