Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "If Jesus wasn’t a real historical figure, where did Christian theology come from? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We have contemporaneous witness written account, we have written account of a witness to worshippers only a few decades later, not even a lifetime later, and we still have the same ethnic group in Syria practicing Christianity since the founding of that church was documented in the Gospels, as well as the lineage of patriarchs of the Syrian church - its on Wikipedia. Not sure what the heck else would convince a devils advocate here[/quote] +1 I am glad this topic came up, though. It’s actually amazing, all the evidence there is. [/quote] I guess some people just blindly believe what they are told is “evidence”. [/quote] I don’t blindly believe anything in life. I have the ability to read and research and think. Why do you think everyone is blindly accepting and ignorant? You think every historian and scholar in the western world is blind, has the same wrong agenda, etc? Get over yourself. Where is your evidence they are all wrong? What are your qualifications to judge everyone wrong but you? [/quote] Many people just believe what they what to believe. Or, for most Christians, just what they are told to believe. How many actually go examine “evidence”? Not many. What % of these people also believe that he rose from the dead? At most - for people who aren’t blinded by faith - they believe it’s “very likely” he existed. That’s just how it is without unbiased, contemporaneous evidence. People don’t like uncertainty. That part of why we have religion in the first place - to explain the unknown. [/quote] None of your comment applies to 99.9% of the scholars, historians, and academics in the entire western world. [/quote] Where do you pull the 99.9%? Why just the western world? [/quote] [youtube]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=43mDuIN5-ww[/youtube][/quote] He’s a religious studies guy. Not an unbiased historian. Why just the western world? Does the evidence hold up to unbiased scrutiny? [/quote] There's no such thing as an "unbiased historian," and it's very hard to take seriously anyone who thinks there is.[/quote] So all of recorded history is untrue? [/quote] It’s all written by men with their own biases and agendas. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics