Reply to '21-22' DMV LACROSSE OUTLOOK

Forum Index » Lacrosse

Reply to "'21-22' DMV LACROSSE OUTLOOK"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]problem is there are kids (maybe even parents?) who really thinking Yorktown can compete.  [/quote]

They can complete they are the 6A State[b]*[/b] Champs. Parents should recognize. Only as a public school the parents should know not any one can attend you have to live in the right code. [/quote]
*public school.  Cannot compete with privates.  
[/quote]

Sure they can.  Would beat Potomac, Flint Hill, O'Connell, Ireton, SMR, etc.  They'd would have given St. Alban's and Episcopal good games.  This year they'll have another good team but I think they are in trouble in goal.  Riverside would beat all but the top 4 in each of the WCAC and IAC.    [/quote]

Riverside would not beat #5 Heights (WCAC) or #5/6 Episcopal/Albans (IAC) and that is a fact. Nor would any Va or MD public school[/quote]

Ok. The backups of the good schools would crush St Albans. They are bad. Yorktown even has 2 D1 commits at pole and 3rd from NL ‘22. St Albans has an ‘23 LSM that actually can’t defend at all. Heights has a goalie and that’s about it. Won’t come within 10 of SJC or GZ. Schools like STA and Heights should schedule Riverside, Robinson, and Yorktown. Better than playing O’Connell or Ireton. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics