Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "College Football--Big Ten Expansion"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] The B1G has won. It’s over. It has the Northeast metropolitan area… the entire Midwest and Chicago plus the entire West Coast. Outside of ND there are zero reasons to add. The other conferences will make less money but need to be in existence for the B1G schools to keep their money without political fireworks. [/quote] B1G's primary media partner Fox has also won, both in terms of eyeballs and $. Will that translate into nattys? Depends if that $ (including NIL) can overcome climate and cultural conditions that had favored the SEC (and Clemson/FSU) in the BCS era. Texas and Oklahoma won, but now they are in the SEC. The only non-Southern teams to have won were USC and Ohio State. If B1G/Fox hadn't done this, we would have been subjected to another 20 years of ESPN/SEC/Finebaum telling us "it just means more". Hope that's not the case in the new era. And that's only football. B12 got stronger in basketball, but college basketball is withering, with more NBA prospects figuring out that G-League or Europe/Australia is a better place to spend that 1 year before turning pro. Basketball's charm is in March Madness, but if Fox/ESPN complete the reverse takeover through football, the Cinderella teams are going to become fewer and fewer. Also, unless donors figure out how to fund the non-revenue sports more effectively via NIL, etc., our US olympic teams are going to suffer in the future, because many of those summer sports were supported by PAC schools. Maybe they should just turn Stanford and Cal into a USOC megafacility to deal with this. Finally, no one has commented on how this will impact Title IX, because again many women liked playing in the PAC. Sure, the B1G and SEC will spend more now on women's sports, but to what end? It's all about football because of the $, but the impact will be widespread.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics