Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Framing Britney Spears"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Can a lawyer who is better than me PLEASE explain how a judge could ever possibly allow a conservator to earn a percentage of a conservatee's income. This is so wild to me. It appears to be wildly unethical and a huge conflict of interest. How could it possibly be permissible?[/quote] x1000000 This part bothers me the most. Can't a third party intervene, and not have access to the money, and the court have to sign off on large purchases? Or does that make too much sense? I have seen a remaining parent deemed "incapacitated" (not the word used), quite easily - the shifty offspring just had to shop around for the right doctor to sign off, and they did, sadly. Viola! Assets disappear, just like that - in a fraction of the 50-70+ years it took to build them up. Heartbreaking. Then, they claim the person "has debts" - which the offspring has ZERO intention to pay, of course. Britney is smart to refuse to work, if that is what she is still doing. I know she needs help, but people should be lining up to try to give her a somewhat normal life, instead of siphoning her riches. I don't see their sorry arses onstage. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics