Reply to 2024 JonBenet Documentary

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "2024 JonBenet Documentary"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wow.  Did any of you actually watch the cold case documentary?  The parents and Burke did not do this.  The case is bizarre but it’s not the parents.  I feel like it’s eye opening in the same way as the Menendez case is now.  Earlier opinions tainted by smearing and leaks intended to paint these folks as killers.  Watch it and then follow up.  John wasn’t paid for it, didn’t ask for edit of it and was very cooperative. 
The experts didn’t all conclude it was family!  Actually the best FBI profilers and most experienced investigators like Lou Smit and John Douglas concluded it’s an intruder.  Hopefully more sophisticated DNA tests will be taken and some previously investigated suspects could be tied in with that to find out who did this.  [/quote]

Even if you believe an intruder did this, how do you explain the ransom note written on Patsy’s legal pad with her handwriting and speech?

What home intruder kills a little girl and then decides to hang around and write a ransom note before disappearing into the Christmas night?[/quote]

Well, the one that wrote the note in advance bc they planned on kidnapping her.

Put the note on the bottom of the stairs.  Then went to her room to abduct her.  On the way, maybe she started to scream or squirm or something, so they hit her.  Maybe a little too hard.  And she was unconscious.  They are a pedo weirdo, so while she is dying, they continue to strangle her and they get their rocks off.  Then they flee, without going back up to retrieve the note[/quote]

So in your scenario, they hung out in the kitchen, rummaged around to find a pad and pen, wrote a draft note, restarted it, proceeded to write a three page ransom note, put it on the bottom of the stairs, went upstairs to retrieve Jonbenet, fed her pineapple (which you left out), had an altercation with her (which you omitted, but is an important detail because she had some defense marks on her throat near the collar of her shirt), knocked her unconscious with the family flashlight, took her down to a remote part of the basement where they rummaged through patsys paint tray, broke the paintbrush and defiled the child with it, poked at her with a set of toy train tracks taken from an adjacent room in the basement, then found a new role of nylon cord patsy had purchased at the local hardware store and fashioned some kind of ligature at the scene which ultimately strangled jonbenet to death.

Then for good measure they staged the abduction anyway - duct tape on her mouth, loosely tied nylon cord around her hands - and wrapped her in a blanket from the dryer before moving her to the wine cellar, where they left her despite this being a planned abduction with the stated motive of getting money from John. They left fibers from patsy’s jacket on the ligature and duct tape to incriminate her. Several hours and a botched abduction later, the intruder(s) left unnoticed and left no DNA at the scene except one trace fragment so small it still cannot be analyzed.

Sure, that makes sense.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics