Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I love this!

https://www.reddit.com/r/ItEndsWithLawsuits/comments/1jcw3ua/blake_getting_shade_from_america_ferrera/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button[/quote]

Yeah, a 20 year old video of America Ferrera rolling her eyes about the plot of Gossip Girl sure is relevant here.[/quote]

Absolutely relevant. BL was insufferable 20 years ago and it looks like it hasn’t changed.

[/quote]

A page ago, someone was saying "mansplaining isn't harassment" even though actually, yes, mansplaining can be harassment if it's part of a "severe and pervasive" culture.

Yet here, we've got a video of Lively kind of babbling incoherently about what plot developments may or may not be upcoming on the show Gossip Girl, and her costar in the movie they are promoting rolling her eyes because the subject was stupid and Lively was responding badly. Okay. What about Lively's behavior here relates to ANYTHING that Baldoni or Wayfarer are alleging regarding this movie? Are they alleging that she talks too much? Is that an actionable tort? Are they alleging that she spent a lot of time during promotion of IEWU discussing the plot of Gossip Girl? That would be problematic but I don't think it happened.

It is not actually illegal to be "insufferable." And if your point is that Lively is insufferable and has been for 20 years, then the next question is why on earth they cast her in this movie if they knew exactly what kind of personality they were getting. It's like casting Ben Affleck in a movie and then later suing him because he often arrived to set with a hangdog expression, carrying some Dunkin' Donuts. That's not illegal! It's a known feature of his personality. Take it or leave it.[/quote]

My point is that you are deranged and insufferable, just like BL. Big side eye roll to you also. You become so unhinged when anything is introduced that counters your BL narrative. Do you eat? What about take a potty break? Because you are at this site 24/7. It’s like you are BL, but without 4 young kids.

This is an Entertainment and Pop Culture site, not a legal thread for you to practice all of your legal theorems, fantasies, and mock legal court at 24/7. Other people have differing perspectives and do not want 400+ pages on crap that’s mainly a rehash of your legal theories daily.

I mean no new news have been posted by the courts today, yet you seem to be aiming for rehashing old details, over and over again, just to put more pro BL stuff on this thread.

It’s nauseating and an abuse of forum decorum.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics