Reply to TJ admissions decision - repercussions for Class of 2026

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "TJ admissions decision - repercussions for Class of 2026"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
You taught DC integrity which is valuable. Also,. I'm still hoping they investigated everyone who ticked off these boxes and disqualified anyone who lied.[/quote]

It was not a lie.  To answer no was the real lie, since everyone was eligible for free meals.  People asked the admissions office and were told they could answer yes.  To disqualify someone for answering correctly is unethical.  They could maybe investigate and take away the bonus points.[/quote]

We all know what the questions meant.

Very unethical to misrepresent your family situation.

I guess some people will try to rationalize their bad behavior. 
[/quote]

But it wouldn't have matter if you did since their automated software would simply look up whether you were eligible for this in their database. I can't believe these pro-privlege parents are still pushing this conspiracy.[/quote]

Where are you getting this information? Have you verified this? Income status was self-reported via the free meals questions and to my knowledge was not verified. If you can prove otherwise, please do. It was a gross loophole that the testing centers got wind of.  [/quote]

Every time this poster pushes this ludicrous theory that FCPS has access to IRS records - we should post the summary below.  This Trumpian poster believes that repeating a lie will somehow make it the truth

[b]This is what happened

1. They may have 2019 and earlier info for FCPS families, but they wouldn't have that data for APS, LCPS, or other non-FCPS families. If every single kid who attends a prep center were instructed to check 'yes' to those questions, then they're counting 90-100 UMC LCPS kids as low income. FCPS doesn't care, though, as long as they can get a good press release.

2. They didn't collect income data during the pandemic, since families previously above the income cutoff may have had a loss of income or a loss of jobs from the pandemic. This unfortunately makes a very large, exploitable loophole for UMC families. Undoubtedly, the free meals question allowed some portion of mediocre, higher SES kids to leapfrog the highly gifted ones at the "TJ Feeder" Centers. If every applicant has nearly a 4.0 and decent essays, the free points for checking the ED boxes would make a huge difference.

3. There surely are some low income kids who are well qualified for TJ. The kids who are well qualified for TJ don't need a substantial number of bonus points allocated to them, especially since every MS has a 1.5% allocation. Giving them the extra points is akin to saying that they aren't qualified enough to be picked on their own merits.[/b][/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics