Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Asian American student with 1590 SAT score blames affirmative action for rejections from 6 colleges"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Here's the solution. Set a filter with X GPA and Y SAT scores. Throw all people who make it into the pool and use a random computer algorithm to pick people. Totally the fairest way to choose. All of the extraneous stuff is nonsense. Schools should decide where they want to set the bar for quality, then have a completely race agnostic system for selection. Drawing straws is fair after the cutoff is met.[/quote] Except, there are so many problems with this supposed fair solution and how the algorithm will work: 1. Who is a better engineering candidate...a kid with a 1400 SAT that is 800 Math / 600 Verbal, or a kid with a 1500 SAT that is 700 Math / 800 verbal? Flip that example around for someone applying as an English Major? 2. Who is a better college applicant...the kid that was one of the 10 Regeneron finalists with a 1550 SAT...or a kid that did nothing but has a 1590 SAT? 3. If you are applying to Yale for drama...how does any of this apply? 4. Again, who is the better candidate...the kid that had to work 30 hours per week during the school year to help support his family and got a 1500 SAT with no test prep help, or the rich kid that received 50 hours of paid test prep and scored a 1550? The list could go on and on...how will the algorithm figure this out? [/quote] You have to draw the line in the sand somewhere. There are too many people with perfect qualifications, as this thread goes on and on about, so most of your points are moot. Set the limit for quality than randomly choose. End of story. No more fluff garbage like saving infants in 3rd world countries, no more sob stories of growing up without running water, no more BS my dad is an alumni and contributes a lot of money, no more ID crap. Random selection. Donezo.[/quote] You are free to start a university and do exactly this. However, current universities are free to set their own guidelines for selecting students. FYI---they obviously see the value in accepting the low income/inner city student with only a 1500 who works 30 hours/week to help support their family. The fact that it might come at the expense of your kid does not make it the wrong choice. A High SAT does not (and should not) guarantee you admission to an elite college. [/quote] Sure. But those same universities claiming they're private and can use racist decision making in their selections should simultaneously be cutoff from federal funding and any research grants from taxpayer dollars. You can't have it both ways.[/quote] Schools that are rejecting 95% of their applicants are not using racism. The asian with a 1590/4.0 who gets rejected has good company with many other asians, whites, blacks, hispanics, etc who also got rejected. Plenty of kids with those stats are getting rejected, because the school is rejecting majority of students, most of whom are highly qualified. So it's not "racism" to reject someone with good test scores. Also, the research done at universities costs the government far less than it would in industry.....remove the research and we would crumble as a country and could not afford to pay full price for the research. [/quote] +1 You're making too much sense here. The sock puppet troll will neither understand nor receive it.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics