Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Ellington. $250 m for 600 students. Murch. $70 m for 700 students."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is exhausting. Parents are to blame because they wrongly believe that anything new and shiny means the school is better. So they bitch non stop for new facilities and wow, the test scores still suck. You can renovate Cardozo, rebuild Dunbar and build a new brook land middle...guess what the test scores are abysmal, high SES parents won't send their kids there but yet everyone whines to spend more money or more new buildings.[/quote] I don't believe it will change test scores. But I'd like my kids (and ALL other kid in the city) to have decent facility because DECENCY. How's that for a reason? Or do you think poorly performing kids /schools should just be left in squalor?[/quote] So true about 'new and shiny'. DCPS needs to pragmatically address deficiencies rather than creating shrines. There are too many instance of extremes between modernized facilities like Dunbar and largely neglected facilities like Orr. The process needs to be data driven and not influenced by politics as it's been done to date. Independent auditors need to watch the process and most importantly the dough (Ellington is an affront to taxpayers above all). Planning needs to be equitable between schools serving the full public education spectrum.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics