Reply to We all need to read this WaPo piece about atypical marriages

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "We all need to read this WaPo piece about atypical marriages"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Eww! These relationships shouldn’t be called marriages.  They need to come up with another word.[/quote]
Why shouldn't they be called marriages? Many marriages are already sexless, I don't see why a lavender marriage should get called out as different. They were adults going in. I went into my marriage knowing ... exactly nothing about how the future would roll out. Let's let everybody else make their own decisions and leave them alone.[/quote]

Because marriage[b], to me,[/b] is already defined, as created by God, as a union between one man and one woman.[/quote]

FIFY, and don't let Jesus catch you judging![/quote]

Sorry, but that doesn't work. Marriage is an institution created and ordained by God. Go make up your own word for these weird scenarios.[/quote]

Marriage is a tax-break provided by the government, and a control structure meant to provide and indoctrinate children. [/quote]
Like how you are trying to indoctrinate. [/quote]

Well yes. History is quite clear that societies with marriage with multiple partners are much less prosperous and much less stable. It is in the interest of societies which are prosperous and stable to promote the structural values to replicate themselves. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics