Reply to Board of Education Board Business Meeting Sept 25 Thread

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Board of Education Board Business Meeting Sept 25 Thread"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Last I knew, BOE was never going to vote on the Program Analysis. They do believe that it falls under operations, hence belonging to the Sup. I think they'll get recommendations in Dec, but that's it - no vote.

[b]BOE will vote on Boundary Analysis, because Sup said they should.[/b] So the Program Analysis will be built into the Boundary Analysis vote.

If BOE members are willing to vote "no" to Boundary Analysis, that's one way to slow/stop Program Analysis, but unlikely enough members will vote "no." Otherwise, BOE members need a serious re-education on what their role is supposed to be, providing guidance and oversight, esp to such a large endeavor as the Program Analysis. Same reason why Sup thought BOE should vote on Boundary Analysis.

Shady that unelected Central Office bureaucrats can make such monumental decisions and sidestep a vote by BOE and without regard to community input.[/quote]

No, the BOE must vote on all recommended boundary changes as a matter of policy. There is no such policy requiring a vote for program changes, but Taylor did say earlier this year he would bring the program analysis to the board for a vote. But something seems to have shifted since then.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics