Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Georgetown Fellow taken outside his home in Arlington"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]From various articles: A DHS spokesperson claimed the Georgetown student had “close connections” to a senior adviser to Hamas, which Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined “rendered him deportable” under the Immigration and Nationality Act on March 15.[/quote] Yet to be confirmed. But regardless, guilt by association is not a thing in America. [/quote] Certainly is. You ever hear of RICO? Moreover, we informally judge people based on associations all the time. Trump and the Proud Boys, for example. Devil is in the details.[/quote] You cannot be prosecuted under RICO because your father in law is in the mob. Are you actually this dumb?[/quote] Obviously. But if you engage in predicate acts, you can be charged with racketeering if those acts are connected to an enterprise. It’s a form of guilt by association. Likewise, (in many states) a person can be held responsible for the acts of a co-conspirator even if s/he did not plan, agree to, or even directly participate in those acts. In other words, yes, guilt by association is a “thing” in multiple areas of the law. [/quote] How can you be a co-conspirator without being involved in some degree in planning or agreeing to such acts? It's kinda the definition: This is from the website of a law firm that does white collar federal defense: The [b]agreement[/b] by two or more persons is the essence of the crime.[b] If there is no agreement, there can be no conspiracy.[/b] The co-conspirators must agree to commit a federal crime or to defraud the United States or any federal agency in any manner and for any purpose. At least one co-conspirator must take an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. By your reasoning the owner of a gas station where someone involved in a crime fills their tank could be a co-conspirator if the vehicle was being used in furtherance of a conspiracy. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics