Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, this is fascism. He is being punished for social media posts critical of Israel and India. That is all he did.
but if a conservative dares to say the N word out loud, even as a joke or quoting somebody else, you probably believe that they should be canceled or worse. the left always accuses others of exactly what they are doing themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, this is fascism. He is being punished for social media posts critical of Israel and India. That is all he did.
but if a conservative dares to say the N word out loud, even as a joke or quoting somebody else, you probably believe that they should be canceled or worse. the left always accuses others of exactly what they are doing themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Read the artcile. There was more than just that.
He is a Hamas sympathizer. No need for more of those in this country.
NP. I read the article and if this is the evidence against him there is nothing here. I see a writer making all sorts of interpretations and stating them as facts. The journalist interprets the guy's post about how Hamas "dealt" with children, which at worst is ambiguous and more likely sounds critical to me, as support for Hamas?? How?! And just because because a random article calls it a defense/justification of Hamas, we accept it?
Here is another passage:
In another post, he stated that Palestine’s elected government must sustain its resistance, legitimizing Hamas’s violent actions. Years ago, he expressed support for Hamas founder Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, posting a video saying, “This is what Hamas argues. Sheikh Yaseen giving the reasons why his group is fighting for their land which was stolen,” legitimizing Hamas’s violent actions.
Again... what? The quote in no way "legitimizes Hamas's violent actions" or even "expresses support." It reports what Hamas has said.
I have no clue whether this man is a Hamas sympathizer or not but one poorly written article, full of assumptions and illogical leaps, only proves that people didn't like him.
Insane that anyone could use that article as evidence. What is wrong with people's critical thinking skills?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From various articles:
A DHS spokesperson claimed the Georgetown student had “close connections” to a senior adviser to Hamas, which Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined “rendered him deportable” under the Immigration and Nationality Act on March 15.
Yet to be confirmed. But regardless, guilt by association is not a thing in America.
Certainly is. You ever hear of RICO?
Moreover, we informally judge people based on associations all the time. Trump and the Proud Boys, for example.
Devil is in the details.
You cannot be prosecuted under RICO because your father in law is in the mob. Are you actually this dumb?
Obviously. But if you engage in predicate acts, you can be charged with racketeering if those acts are connected to an enterprise.
It’s a form of guilt by association.
Likewise, (in many states) a person can be held responsible for the acts of a co-conspirator even if s/he did not plan, agree to, or even directly participate in those acts.
In other words, yes, guilt by association is a “thing” in multiple areas of the law.
So what predicate acts did he engage in?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where’s the poster who freaks out that any kind of internet moderation is “totalitarian “? She should read this. This is fascism, people.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/19/trump-deportation-georgetown-graduate-student-00239754
Why are agents wearing masks?
Anonymous wrote:
Read the artcile. There was more than just that.
He is a Hamas sympathizer. No need for more of those in this country.
Anonymous wrote:so now we have professors, researcher, people who are foriegn (like the white german person and the white french person) and a variety of people of hispanic origin all being harassed, detained and deported without cause or warrant.
MAGAs, you want to explain this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From various articles:
A DHS spokesperson claimed the Georgetown student had “close connections” to a senior adviser to Hamas, which Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined “rendered him deportable” under the Immigration and Nationality Act on March 15.
Yet to be confirmed. But regardless, guilt by association is not a thing in America.
Let the facts play out. The public does not know what those close connections are and/or whether he took any steps to support Hamas.
Tell it to the professional soccer player who is currently slave labor in an El Salvador gulag right now because Trump and ICE are sloppy AF.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, this is fascism. He is being punished for social media posts critical of Israel and India. That is all he did.
Anonymous wrote:If you know anyone traveling to the US from abroad, make sure they scrub their text messages before they arrive. Or, better yet, have them travel with a phone bought just for travel. Apparently, the Thought Police (authorities at US ports of entry) can ask to see your cell phone and can check your text messages. Don't speak ill of Dear Leader--or else! Wonder how long before they start censoring citizens...
French scientist denied US entry after phone messages critical of Trump found
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/19/trump-musk-french-scientist-detained
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From various articles:
A DHS spokesperson claimed the Georgetown student had “close connections” to a senior adviser to Hamas, which Secretary of State Marco Rubio determined “rendered him deportable” under the Immigration and Nationality Act on March 15.
Yet to be confirmed. But regardless, guilt by association is not a thing in America.
Certainly is. You ever hear of RICO?
Moreover, we informally judge people based on associations all the time. Trump and the Proud Boys, for example.
Devil is in the details.
You cannot be prosecuted under RICO because your father in law is in the mob. Are you actually this dumb?
Obviously. But if you engage in predicate acts, you can be charged with racketeering if those acts are connected to an enterprise.
It’s a form of guilt by association.
Likewise, (in many states) a person can be held responsible for the acts of a co-conspirator even if s/he did not plan, agree to, or even directly participate in those acts.
In other words, yes, guilt by association is a “thing” in multiple areas of the law.
Anonymous wrote:Where’s the poster who freaks out that any kind of internet moderation is “totalitarian “? She should read this. This is fascism, people.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/19/trump-deportation-georgetown-graduate-student-00239754