Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Who can write Project 2028?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]But doesn't it make sense for people who really WANT NWS to be the ones paying for it. Republicans never worry about climate change, and they are so poor they don't own houses near the beach so they don't worry about hurricanes. Why should they be taxed so that smarter, richer weather junkies can get their weather reports for free? Like, if you're a shipping company, you would pay a lot for hurricane data. If you own a beach house, you would pay a moderate amount. If you are a climate change enthusiast, you would pay a little something. And if you are the type of Republican outdoorsman who says "there's no such thing as bad weather, only bad gear," you're probably okay with the free private sector weather reports. Isn't it a little uncool for us to force other people to fund our interests? Also, I have a sneaking suspicion that a lot of people claim to love NOAA more than they really do. It's a way of saying you're smart, saying you're not a climate denier, saying you oppose government layoffs, etc. But are these people really checking the NOAA data feeds on the reg? I'm not so sure. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics