Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Question for Trumpers"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How you can equate a consensual BJ as the same thing as nonconsensual sexual assault shows how stupid you are and how low your standards are? In the famous words of another elected repugnant, make sure to tell your girls to lay back and just enjoy getting raped. [/quote] This is exactly what I’m talking about. Commit perjury eventually leading your -year suspension from the practice of law and probable disbarment from SCOTUS (WJC resigned rather than face the music)? We’ll just frame this as being about consensual BJ’s. When it is the other side? Then it is a strict morality code. Again, you’re free to disagree with me on the substance, but if a guy being ineligible to practice law before SCOTUS because of his crimes isn’t “disqualifying” from being POTUS, then don’t be shocked when other people also abandon the “disqualifying” metric. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
