Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Tom Cruise’s free pass"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How is it that Tim Cruise has managed to avoid the stink of being a father that abandoned his child? It doesn’t seem like any other major celebrity could not see their child for a decade, through that kid’s entire childhood, and still do interviews where no one asks about it and do hit movie after movie. No one ever asks him about it and it is just so weird that he walked away from a 5 yr old kid forever.[/quote] Couple of reasons: 1–Because Katie Holmes dare not complain about it for (completely founded) concerns of retribution. Scientologists are ruthless when it comes to doxing and making one’s life miserable. She knows full well that it’s better to strike a deal and stay quiet than to have her whole life blow up in her face. He is well connected in Hollywood (bc he’s a rainmaker for people in power…even if they are annoyed by his antics and his “religion”He still pulls audiences to the box office!) but you dont cross Scientology without repercussions. This is known by politicians and journalists alike so no one says a word. It’s a machine. 2–And Tom is like the number two guy in the organization so he doesn’t even have to get his hands dirty. They would do all the work for him. And they will defend him as though he were a god. 3. The issue of “abandonment” is complicated. In his “religion” he can’t stay “connected” to someone (Suri) who is still “connected to” a “suppressive Person” (Katie)—or this puts his own eternity at risk. He has no option but to sever ties with Scientology OR sever ties with Suri bc she is still connected to Katie. An “SP” is someone who is anti-Scientology and is thought to bring negative influence into your life that prevents you from moving up the bridge to Total Freedom. As a practicing Scientologist, Tom had to either “handle” the potential SP (meaning you bring them back into the fold and convince them they were wrong and need to go into therapy sessions/auditing to figure out what was making them be anti-Scientology and “fix” that engram/trouble spot in their thinking) OR cut off any connection to that person and any of those influences that could be responsible for holding you back. Tom could not “handle” Katie back into Scientology and she refused to give up Suri to him—so that left him with no option but to cut them both out if he is going to remain in Scientology. If media were to run with that story as a “negative” message against Scientology then they would be accused of “religious bigotry”—and no one wants to touch it. Plus—they won’t get verification from Katie on it bc her silence on the subject is the price she is paying for his agreement to walk away and allow her to leave in peace. ***allegedly….to all of the above*** [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics