Reply to Inappropriate to show fat legs?

Forum Index » Beauty and Fashion

Reply to "Inappropriate to show fat legs?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don’t know, I’m torn.  Does it look good? Well, no.  But I get people of all sizes don’t want to be hot and want to wear something cool and comfortable.

But the more flesh you have, the easier it is to look “inappropriate.” Im thin with an A cup.  I could wear a plunging neck dress and still look acceptable in most settings since I have zero cleavage.  Someone with a DD can’t. Well, they could... but others would judge them more harshly[/quote]
If your boobs and cleavage are down by your legs where OP was asking about, that’s a really deep plunge and you probably don’t look acceptable in it.

I’m fat and I wear shorts. I hate being hot. I do love that the fat shamers keep showing their colors. [/quote]

But the sentiment is the same.  Someone wearing 3 inch inseam shorts with long, thin, toned legs is going to be perceived a lot differently than someone wearing 3 inch shorts with rolls of inner thigh fat hanging out and cellulite all over.  [/quote]
Not really. One is more about patriarchal beliefs regarding vulgarity and one is more about patriarchal beliefs about how women’s bodies “should” look, aka fat shaming. Vulgarity and fat shaming aren’t the same thing, except that women are the ones most likely to aggressively police other women’s appearances. [/quote]

Why do you think a healthy woman's body is vulgar? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics