Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Duke’s Acceptance Rate Completely Plummeted This Year - What Happened?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I haven’t heard of a school that didn’t have a 15% increase in early apps.[/quote] Most of Duke’s peer schools did not, only Dartmouth was close to having that level of increase. Harvard - 2% increase UPenn - 3% increase Columbia - 9% decrease (shocking) Dartmouth - 14% increase (they went need-blind for internationals) Yale - 6% increase Duke - 20% increase[/quote] This is your proof that you are not correctly classifying it’s peer schools. Most of these schools already had an ED/REA acceptance rate lower than Duke’s this year. Vanderbilt, Emory, Rice are way closer to a peer schools. Also, Duke chose to take fewer kids ED this year, so that’s part of the reason for the decline.[/quote] Emory? Lol. Duke and UPenn had the same ED acceptance rate this year (15%). Columbia just trended in the wrong direction (probably due to their admissions reporting scandal). Dartmouth accepted ~19% this year. Of course you can’t compare the early rates at Harvard and Yale because those are not binding. As an Ivy grad, Duke is absolutely our peer for undergrad, and it’s more selective than several of them. I wouldn’t really consider Emory a peer at all. Vanderbilt and Rice are great but I believe Duke stands above both quite comfortably[/quote] Of course you can compare the early rates at Harvard and Yale, that’s a ridiculous rationalization. MIT, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Cal tech and Princeton are the top tier. Duke is with the lower Ivies, Hopkins, Vanderbilt, Chicago. I think Rice is in this second tier as well. 5 year old, self reported cross admit victories are pretty meaningless.[/quote] “Lower ivies” :roll: Vanderbilt and Hopkins are great but they’re not quite there. Maybe Chicago is[/quote] Just your weekly reminder than Hopkins passed Duke in the US News rankings this year. Also ranked higher than Duke in the Times global rankings. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2023/world-ranking[/quote] Why do you care, I’m assuming you’re a Hopkins alum? I think Hopkins is a great school but I’m pretty sure they lose like 80% of their cross-admits to Duke. Again both schools are great but we’ve seen how US News gets manipulated, it’s better to see how people vote with their feet and $$$ cause that’s what gets people through the door. Hopkins had a good ED year though, 2700 applicants for a 20% ED rate. Duke’s was 15% but I don’t think a difference like that matters too much[/quote] I didn’t say that Hopkins was better than Duke just that they are in the same tier. The Paragon data is both dated and not reliable because it is self reported. Garbage in, garbage out. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics