Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven’t heard of a school that didn’t have a 15% increase in early apps.
Most of Duke’s peer schools did not, only Dartmouth was close to having that level of increase.
Harvard - 2% increase
UPenn - 3% increase
Columbia - 9% decrease (shocking)
Dartmouth - 14% increase (they went need-blind for internationals)
Yale - 6% increase
Duke - 20% increase
This is your proof that you are not correctly classifying it’s peer schools. Most of these schools already had an ED/REA acceptance rate lower than Duke’s this year. Vanderbilt, Emory, Rice are way closer to a peer schools.
Also, Duke chose to take fewer kids ED this year, so that’s part of the reason for the decline.
Emory? Lol. Duke and UPenn had the same ED acceptance rate this year (15%). Columbia just trended in the wrong direction (probably due to their admissions reporting scandal). Dartmouth accepted ~19% this year. Of course you can’t compare the early rates at Harvard and Yale because those are not binding. As an Ivy grad, Duke is absolutely our peer for undergrad, and it’s more selective than several of them. I wouldn’t really consider Emory a peer at all. Vanderbilt and Rice are great but I believe Duke stands above both quite comfortably
Of course you can compare the early rates at Harvard and Yale, that’s a ridiculous rationalization. MIT, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Cal tech and Princeton are the top tier. Duke is with the lower Ivies, Hopkins, Vanderbilt, Chicago. I think Rice is in this second tier as well.
5 year old, self reported cross admit victories are pretty meaningless.
“Lower ivies”Vanderbilt and Hopkins are great but they’re not quite there. Maybe Chicago is
Just your weekly reminder than Hopkins passed Duke in the US News rankings this year. Also ranked higher than Duke in the Times global rankings. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2023/world-ranking
Why do you care, I’m assuming you’re a Hopkins alum? I think Hopkins is a great school but I’m pretty sure they lose like 80% of their cross-admits to Duke. Again both schools are great but we’ve seen how US News gets manipulated, it’s better to see how people vote with their feet and $$$ cause that’s what gets people through the door. Hopkins had a good ED year though, 2700 applicants for a 20% ED rate. Duke’s was 15% but I don’t think a difference like that matters too much
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Either the application numbers increased, or Duke decided to accept fewer in the ED round compared to last year, or both.
This. I mean there are only 2 obvious answers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven’t heard of a school that didn’t have a 15% increase in early apps.
Most of Duke’s peer schools did not, only Dartmouth was close to having that level of increase.
Harvard - 2% increase
UPenn - 3% increase
Columbia - 9% decrease (shocking)
Dartmouth - 14% increase (they went need-blind for internationals)
Yale - 6% increase
Duke - 20% increase
This is your proof that you are not correctly classifying it’s peer schools. Most of these schools already had an ED/REA acceptance rate lower than Duke’s this year. Vanderbilt, Emory, Rice are way closer to a peer schools.
Also, Duke chose to take fewer kids ED this year, so that’s part of the reason for the decline.
Emory? Lol. Duke and UPenn had the same ED acceptance rate this year (15%). Columbia just trended in the wrong direction (probably due to their admissions reporting scandal). Dartmouth accepted ~19% this year. Of course you can’t compare the early rates at Harvard and Yale because those are not binding. As an Ivy grad, Duke is absolutely our peer for undergrad, and it’s more selective than several of them. I wouldn’t really consider Emory a peer at all. Vanderbilt and Rice are great but I believe Duke stands above both quite comfortably
Anonymous wrote:Why don't you Hopkins and Duke supporters just get yer lacrosse sticks and rumble in the parking lot?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven’t heard of a school that didn’t have a 15% increase in early apps.
Most of Duke’s peer schools did not, only Dartmouth was close to having that level of increase.
Harvard - 2% increase
UPenn - 3% increase
Columbia - 9% decrease (shocking)
Dartmouth - 14% increase (they went need-blind for internationals)
Yale - 6% increase
Duke - 20% increase
This is your proof that you are not correctly classifying it’s peer schools. Most of these schools already had an ED/REA acceptance rate lower than Duke’s this year. Vanderbilt, Emory, Rice are way closer to a peer schools.
Also, Duke chose to take fewer kids ED this year, so that’s part of the reason for the decline.
Emory? Lol. Duke and UPenn had the same ED acceptance rate this year (15%). Columbia just trended in the wrong direction (probably due to their admissions reporting scandal). Dartmouth accepted ~19% this year. Of course you can’t compare the early rates at Harvard and Yale because those are not binding. As an Ivy grad, Duke is absolutely our peer for undergrad, and it’s more selective than several of them. I wouldn’t really consider Emory a peer at all. Vanderbilt and Rice are great but I believe Duke stands above both quite comfortably
Of course you can compare the early rates at Harvard and Yale, that’s a ridiculous rationalization. MIT, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Cal tech and Princeton are the top tier. Duke is with the lower Ivies, Hopkins, Vanderbilt, Chicago. I think Rice is in this second tier as well.
5 year old, self reported cross admit victories are pretty meaningless.
“Lower ivies”Vanderbilt and Hopkins are great but they’re not quite there. Maybe Chicago is
Just your weekly reminder than Hopkins passed Duke in the US News rankings this year. Also ranked higher than Duke in the Times global rankings. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2023/world-ranking
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven’t heard of a school that didn’t have a 15% increase in early apps.
Most of Duke’s peer schools did not, only Dartmouth was close to having that level of increase.
Harvard - 2% increase
UPenn - 3% increase
Columbia - 9% decrease (shocking)
Dartmouth - 14% increase (they went need-blind for internationals)
Yale - 6% increase
Duke - 20% increase
This is your proof that you are not correctly classifying it’s peer schools. Most of these schools already had an ED/REA acceptance rate lower than Duke’s this year. Vanderbilt, Emory, Rice are way closer to a peer schools.
Also, Duke chose to take fewer kids ED this year, so that’s part of the reason for the decline.
Emory? Lol. Duke and UPenn had the same ED acceptance rate this year (15%). Columbia just trended in the wrong direction (probably due to their admissions reporting scandal). Dartmouth accepted ~19% this year. Of course you can’t compare the early rates at Harvard and Yale because those are not binding. As an Ivy grad, Duke is absolutely our peer for undergrad, and it’s more selective than several of them. I wouldn’t really consider Emory a peer at all. Vanderbilt and Rice are great but I believe Duke stands above both quite comfortably
Of course you can compare the early rates at Harvard and Yale, that’s a ridiculous rationalization. MIT, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Cal tech and Princeton are the top tier. Duke is with the lower Ivies, Hopkins, Vanderbilt, Chicago. I think Rice is in this second tier as well.
5 year old, self reported cross admit victories are pretty meaningless.
“Lower ivies”Vanderbilt and Hopkins are great but they’re not quite there. Maybe Chicago is
Just your weekly reminder than Hopkins passed Duke in the US News rankings this year. Also ranked higher than Duke in the Times global rankings. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2023/world-ranking
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven’t heard of a school that didn’t have a 15% increase in early apps.
Most of Duke’s peer schools did not, only Dartmouth was close to having that level of increase.
Harvard - 2% increase
UPenn - 3% increase
Columbia - 9% decrease (shocking)
Dartmouth - 14% increase (they went need-blind for internationals)
Yale - 6% increase
Duke - 20% increase
This is your proof that you are not correctly classifying it’s peer schools. Most of these schools already had an ED/REA acceptance rate lower than Duke’s this year. Vanderbilt, Emory, Rice are way closer to a peer schools.
Also, Duke chose to take fewer kids ED this year, so that’s part of the reason for the decline.
Emory? Lol. Duke and UPenn had the same ED acceptance rate this year (15%). Columbia just trended in the wrong direction (probably due to their admissions reporting scandal). Dartmouth accepted ~19% this year. Of course you can’t compare the early rates at Harvard and Yale because those are not binding. As an Ivy grad, Duke is absolutely our peer for undergrad, and it’s more selective than several of them. I wouldn’t really consider Emory a peer at all. Vanderbilt and Rice are great but I believe Duke stands above both quite comfortably
Of course you can compare the early rates at Harvard and Yale, that’s a ridiculous rationalization. MIT, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Cal tech and Princeton are the top tier. Duke is with the lower Ivies, Hopkins, Vanderbilt, Chicago. I think Rice is in this second tier as well.
5 year old, self reported cross admit victories are pretty meaningless.
“Lower ivies”Vanderbilt and Hopkins are great but they’re not quite there. Maybe Chicago is
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven’t heard of a school that didn’t have a 15% increase in early apps.
Most of Duke’s peer schools did not, only Dartmouth was close to having that level of increase.
Harvard - 2% increase
UPenn - 3% increase
Columbia - 9% decrease (shocking)
Dartmouth - 14% increase (they went need-blind for internationals)
Yale - 6% increase
Duke - 20% increase
This is your proof that you are not correctly classifying it’s peer schools. Most of these schools already had an ED/REA acceptance rate lower than Duke’s this year. Vanderbilt, Emory, Rice are way closer to a peer schools.
Also, Duke chose to take fewer kids ED this year, so that’s part of the reason for the decline.
Emory? Lol. Duke and UPenn had the same ED acceptance rate this year (15%). Columbia just trended in the wrong direction (probably due to their admissions reporting scandal). Dartmouth accepted ~19% this year. Of course you can’t compare the early rates at Harvard and Yale because those are not binding. As an Ivy grad, Duke is absolutely our peer for undergrad, and it’s more selective than several of them. I wouldn’t really consider Emory a peer at all. Vanderbilt and Rice are great but I believe Duke stands above both quite comfortably
Of course you can compare the early rates at Harvard and Yale, that’s a ridiculous rationalization. MIT, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, Cal tech and Princeton are the top tier. Duke is with the lower Ivies, Hopkins, Vanderbilt, Chicago. I think Rice is in this second tier as well.
5 year old, self reported cross admit victories are pretty meaningless.
Vanderbilt and Hopkins are great but they’re not quite there. Maybe Chicago isAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven’t heard of a school that didn’t have a 15% increase in early apps.
Most of Duke’s peer schools did not, only Dartmouth was close to having that level of increase.
Harvard - 2% increase
UPenn - 3% increase
Columbia - 9% decrease (shocking)
Dartmouth - 14% increase (they went need-blind for internationals)
Yale - 6% increase
Duke - 20% increase
This is your proof that you are not correctly classifying it’s peer schools. Most of these schools already had an ED/REA acceptance rate lower than Duke’s this year. Vanderbilt, Emory, Rice are way closer to a peer schools.
Also, Duke chose to take fewer kids ED this year, so that’s part of the reason for the decline.
Emory? Lol. Duke and UPenn had the same ED acceptance rate this year (15%). Columbia just trended in the wrong direction (probably due to their admissions reporting scandal). Dartmouth accepted ~19% this year. Of course you can’t compare the early rates at Harvard and Yale because those are not binding. As an Ivy grad, Duke is absolutely our peer for undergrad, and it’s more selective than several of them. I wouldn’t really consider Emory a peer at all. Vanderbilt and Rice are great but I believe Duke stands above both quite comfortably
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven’t heard of a school that didn’t have a 15% increase in early apps.
Most of Duke’s peer schools did not, only Dartmouth was close to having that level of increase.
Harvard - 2% increase
UPenn - 3% increase
Columbia - 9% decrease (shocking)
Dartmouth - 14% increase (they went need-blind for internationals)
Yale - 6% increase
Duke - 20% increase
This is your proof that you are not correctly classifying it’s peer schools. Most of these schools already had an ED/REA acceptance rate lower than Duke’s this year. Vanderbilt, Emory, Rice are way closer to a peer schools.
Also, Duke chose to take fewer kids ED this year, so that’s part of the reason for the decline.
Emory? Lol. Duke and UPenn had the same ED acceptance rate this year (15%). Columbia just trended in the wrong direction (probably due to their admissions reporting scandal). Dartmouth accepted ~19% this year. Of course you can’t compare the early rates at Harvard and Yale because those are not binding. As an Ivy grad, Duke is absolutely our peer for undergrad, and it’s more selective than several of them. I wouldn’t really consider Emory a peer at all. Vanderbilt and Rice are great but I believe Duke stands above both quite comfortably
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I haven’t heard of a school that didn’t have a 15% increase in early apps.
Most of Duke’s peer schools did not, only Dartmouth was close to having that level of increase.
Harvard - 2% increase
UPenn - 3% increase
Columbia - 9% decrease (shocking)
Dartmouth - 14% increase (they went need-blind for internationals)
Yale - 6% increase
Duke - 20% increase
This is your proof that you are not correctly classifying it’s peer schools. Most of these schools already had an ED/REA acceptance rate lower than Duke’s this year. Vanderbilt, Emory, Rice are way closer to a peer schools.
Also, Duke chose to take fewer kids ED this year, so that’s part of the reason for the decline.