Reply to VA Get Ready For Abortion Ban

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "VA Get Ready For Abortion Ban"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I do'nt understand what I'm reading, honestly. :([/quote]

What do you not understand?
Youngkin ran on banning all contraceptives, all abortions, IVF, any women's medical issues. Not one exception for age, rape or incest. So a 10 year old gets pregnant in VA she gets to carry.

The only reason he has not been able to pass anything is L Louise Lucas

There is a chance this will pass.

Virginia voters are idiots. FACT.
 
From a full abortion ban to privatizing schools welcome to the handmaid's tale and the new Alabama or Missouri.

Anyone sending a college student to any school in VA stupid. Women are going to die in droves.[/quote]

Youngkin didn't run on those things.  During the election people were on here saying he was being secretive about his real plans, telling a pro-lifer that he would do things after he was elected.[/quote]

Oh please, you had to be a fool to think he was not running on these items.

Everyone with a brain knew he was a liar. [/quote]

So you agree he wasn't running on those things explicitly.  You have to call him a liar to attribute these positions to him.[/quote]

Depends on what you mean by "explicitly", doesn't it? Did he say, in so many words, that he supported those positions? No. Did he make it clear that he did support them? Yes.[/quote]

You confirmed the point.  Not only was he not running on those things, he didn't even express support according to you.  That is more than what Mitt Romney did in Massachusetts, who [b]expressed support but said he wouldn't push any of these things[/b].[/quote]

He [i]could[/i] have done that, but he didn’t. Because he DOES want to push those things.

He said he’d “go on the offense” against women’s rights after the election. He couldn’t talk about it before the election or he’d lose the Independent vote. Words right out of his mouth. 
[/quote]

Do you really not understand a politician can state how he personally feels and keep it separate from what he intends to pursue? It's simply not enough for you when a candidate says they're pro life but won't pursue an abortion ban. They must say they're in favor of no holds barred, abortion til end of the pregnancy or they're an extremist, religious zealot. [/quote]

If that were the case for Youngkin, he easily could have come out with a statement like Romney.

He didn't because, as he said himself, he's "going to go on the offense" against women's rights. He's biding time until he can get enough pro-life Ds on board and/or flip a few seats next year.

He's a religious extremist who has no place in our government. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics