Reply to So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Funny how liberals are desperate to discredit the FACTS posted by the WSJ in previous posts as "propaganda."  Bless your hearts.  You may be embarrassed by these FACTS (you should be), but you certainly can't deny their validity.  The fact that you continue to gaslight just makes it clear how desperate you are to deflect and obfuscate.  Too late. [/quote]

So you continue to demonstrate that you can’t distinguish between fact & opinion. And equity & “CRT”.

[/quote]

Newsflash:  the WSJ isn't going to publish an opinion piece that isn't factual.  Just so you know.  And you clearly did NOT read the previous posts, describing exactly what was taught in the teacher trainings.  No one is equating equity to CRT.  You can continue spewing your nonsense in the hope that no one else will bother reading the previous posts.  Good luck to you and your attempts to gaslight.[/quote]

Uh. An opinion isn’t “fact”.

No wonder you got duped. If anyone tells you something you think it’s a fact.

None of that is “CRT”. 
[/quote]

Now address the post above that has very clearly laid out the CRT in teacher training.  Go on.  We'll wait while you make up another lame excuse.[/quote]

So the [i]administrators[/i] - many of whom have Masters/PhDs - are learning about CRT concepts?

That’s not teaching CRT in our schools.  :roll: 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics