Anonymous wrote:CRT not taught in one school in the US

FACT

Curriculums all online people. Apparently, parents in VA are idiots and can not read. They literally could have looked this up. Instead, you listened to the POS liar Youngkin whose kid tried to vote illegally three times. Such a role model. How often is Youngkin ever in VA? He's stumping for DeSantis more. Good luck VA you basically hired Betsey Devos to ruin all schools. You were duped.

You lost!

Anonymous wrote:WSJ link doesn’t work. Which state was this in?

Pennsylvania. It's copied in the previous links.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how liberals are desperate to discredit the FACTS posted by the WSJ in previous posts as "propaganda." Bless your hearts. You may be embarrassed by these FACTS (you should be), but you certainly can't deny their validity. The fact that you continue to gaslight just makes it clear how desperate you are to deflect and obfuscate. Too late.

So you continue to demonstrate that you can’t distinguish between fact & opinion. And equity & “CRT”.

Newsflash: the WSJ isn't going to publish an opinion piece that isn't factual. Just so you know. And you clearly did NOT read the previous posts, describing exactly what was taught in the teacher trainings. No one is equating equity to CRT. You can continue spewing your nonsense in the hope that no one else will bother reading the previous posts. Good luck to you and your attempts to gaslight.

Uh. An opinion isn’t “fact”.

No wonder you got duped. If anyone tells you something you think it’s a fact.

None of that is “CRT”.

Now address the post above that has very clearly laid out the CRT in teacher training. Go on. We'll wait while you make up another lame excuse.

So the administrators - many of whom have Masters/PhDs - are learning about CRT concepts?

That’s not teaching CRT in our schools.

I'll try again, slowly. Administrators - and teachers - are being trained in CRT concepts. These concepts are meant to trickle down into the classrooms. Are you really this dense??

School staff’s ability to use “critical race theory . . . to inform racial equity leadership and analysis of school policies, practices and procedures” is considered a sign of the successful “internalization and application” of Pacific Educational Group’s framework. And a chart includes “Critical Race Theory” as a step toward “Equity/Anti-Racism School Transformation Action Planning.” A Feb. 3, 2021, seminar is even titled “Using Critical Race Theory to Transform Leadership and District.”

Perhaps districts like Tredyffrin-Easttown think they can shoo parents away by making a distinction between teacher training and curriculum. But what is the point of teacher training if not to inform teachers on how they should teach?

CRT not taught in one school in the US

FACT

Curriculums all online people. Apparently, parents in VA are idiots and can not read. They literally could have looked this up. Instead, you listened to the POS liar Youngkin whose kid tried to vote illegally three times. Such a role model. How often is Youngkin ever in VA? He's stumping for DeSantis more. Good luck VA you basically hired Betsey Devos to ruin all schools. You were duped.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how liberals are desperate to discredit the FACTS posted by the WSJ in previous posts as "propaganda." Bless your hearts. You may be embarrassed by these FACTS (you should be), but you certainly can't deny their validity. The fact that you continue to gaslight just makes it clear how desperate you are to deflect and obfuscate. Too late.

So you continue to demonstrate that you can’t distinguish between fact & opinion. And equity & “CRT”.

Newsflash: the WSJ isn't going to publish an opinion piece that isn't factual. Just so you know. And you clearly did NOT read the previous posts, describing exactly what was taught in the teacher trainings. No one is equating equity to CRT. You can continue spewing your nonsense in the hope that no one else will bother reading the previous posts. Good luck to you and your attempts to gaslight.

The WSJ "opinions factual" right there is an oximoron. Do you need a dictionary? Dictionary.com

And the Fed Society opinions are not "factual". WSJ hasn't been "factual" for years.

Omg! Some school administrators in one district in Pennsylvania had one training class that provided guidance on how to take race into perspective as they determine the best ways to support their kids?

LOL. That’s all you have?

That’s not CRT in our schools.

You were duped.

WSJ link doesn’t work. Which state was this in?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how liberals are desperate to discredit the FACTS posted by the WSJ in previous posts as "propaganda." Bless your hearts. You may be embarrassed by these FACTS (you should be), but you certainly can't deny their validity. The fact that you continue to gaslight just makes it clear how desperate you are to deflect and obfuscate. Too late.

So you continue to demonstrate that you can’t distinguish between fact & opinion. And equity & “CRT”.

Newsflash: the WSJ isn't going to publish an opinion piece that isn't factual. Just so you know. And you clearly did NOT read the previous posts, describing exactly what was taught in the teacher trainings. No one is equating equity to CRT. You can continue spewing your nonsense in the hope that no one else will bother reading the previous posts. Good luck to you and your attempts to gaslight.

Uh. An opinion isn’t “fact”.

No wonder you got duped. If anyone tells you something you think it’s a fact.

None of that is “CRT”.

Now address the post above that has very clearly laid out the CRT in teacher training. Go on. We'll wait while you make up another lame excuse.

So the administrators - many of whom have Masters/PhDs - are learning about CRT concepts?

That’s not teaching CRT in our schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how liberals are desperate to discredit the FACTS posted by the WSJ in previous posts as "propaganda." Bless your hearts. You may be embarrassed by these FACTS (you should be), but you certainly can't deny their validity. The fact that you continue to gaslight just makes it clear how desperate you are to deflect and obfuscate. Too late.

So you continue to demonstrate that you can’t distinguish between fact & opinion. And equity & “CRT”.

Newsflash: the WSJ isn't going to publish an opinion piece that isn't factual. Just so you know. And you clearly did NOT read the previous posts, describing exactly what was taught in the teacher trainings. No one is equating equity to CRT. You can continue spewing your nonsense in the hope that no one else will bother reading the previous posts. Good luck to you and your attempts to gaslight.

Uh. An opinion isn’t “fact”.

No wonder you got duped. If anyone tells you something you think it’s a fact.

None of that is “CRT”.

Your opinion certainly isn't fact, that's for sure. Just the same old nonsense, over and over again because you have no leg to stand on. Pathetic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how liberals are desperate to discredit the FACTS posted by the WSJ in previous posts as "propaganda." Bless your hearts. You may be embarrassed by these FACTS (you should be), but you certainly can't deny their validity. The fact that you continue to gaslight just makes it clear how desperate you are to deflect and obfuscate. Too late.

So you continue to demonstrate that you can’t distinguish between fact & opinion. And equity & “CRT”.

Newsflash: the WSJ isn't going to publish an opinion piece that isn't factual. Just so you know. And you clearly did NOT read the previous posts, describing exactly what was taught in the teacher trainings. No one is equating equity to CRT. You can continue spewing your nonsense in the hope that no one else will bother reading the previous posts. Good luck to you and your attempts to gaslight.

Uh. An opinion isn’t “fact”.

No wonder you got duped. If anyone tells you something you think it’s a fact.

None of that is “CRT”.

Now address the post above that has very clearly laid out the CRT in teacher training. Go on. We'll wait while you make up another lame excuse.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how liberals are desperate to discredit the FACTS posted by the WSJ in previous posts as "propaganda." Bless your hearts. You may be embarrassed by these FACTS (you should be), but you certainly can't deny their validity. The fact that you continue to gaslight just makes it clear how desperate you are to deflect and obfuscate. Too late.

So you continue to demonstrate that you can’t distinguish between fact & opinion. And equity & “CRT”.

Newsflash: the WSJ isn't going to publish an opinion piece that isn't factual. Just so you know. And you clearly did NOT read the previous posts, describing exactly what was taught in the teacher trainings. No one is equating equity to CRT. You can continue spewing your nonsense in the hope that no one else will bother reading the previous posts. Good luck to you and your attempts to gaslight.

Uh. An opinion isn’t “fact”.

No wonder you got duped. If anyone tells you something you think it’s a fact.

None of that is “CRT”.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how liberals are desperate to discredit the FACTS posted by the WSJ in previous posts as "propaganda." Bless your hearts. You may be embarrassed by these FACTS (you should be), but you certainly can't deny their validity. The fact that you continue to gaslight just makes it clear how desperate you are to deflect and obfuscate. Too late.

So you continue to demonstrate that you can’t distinguish between fact & opinion. And equity & “CRT”.

Here you go, hon. Since you continue to demonstrate that you can't read. CRT in a nutshell - and labeled as such.

Documents emailed from 2019 to 2021 by Pacific Educational Group to district administrators in advance of various training seminars cite critical race theory explicitly. A rubric dated Feb. 4, 2020, encourages participants to “Deconstruct the Presence and role of Whiteness” in their lives. A March 17, 2020, presentation lists “aspects and assumptions of white culture” in the U.S. Some are negative, such as “win at all costs,” “wealth = worth,” “don’t show emotion,” and in reference to food, “bland is best.” Others are seemingly universal principles such as “cause-and-effect relationships,” “objective, rational, linear thinking,” and “plan for future.”

That presentation also spells out the “5 tenets of critical race theory” to “better understand the critical intersection of race and schooling.” One tenet is the “permanence of racism,” or the idea that “racism is endemic to all our institutions, systems and structures” in the U.S. Another is “whiteness as property.” The “critique of liberalism” tenet argues that “colorblindness,” “neutrality of the law” and the “myth of meritocracy” must be “deconstructed.”

These tenets aren’t presented as abstract notions for faculty to consider, but ideas they’re meant to apply. School staff’s ability to use “critical race theory . . . to inform racial equity leadership and analysis of school policies, practices and procedures” is considered a sign of the successful “internalization and application” of Pacific Educational Group’s framework. And a chart includes “Critical Race Theory” as a step toward “Equity/Anti-Racism School Transformation Action Planning.” A Feb. 3, 2021, seminar is even titled “Using Critical Race Theory to Transform Leadership and District.”

Perhaps districts like Tredyffrin-Easttown think they can shoo parents away by making a distinction between teacher training and curriculum. But what is the point of teacher training if not to inform teachers on how they should teach?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/if-students-dont-lear...ors-students-class-11662150413

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Funny how liberals are desperate to discredit the FACTS posted by the WSJ in previous posts as "propaganda." Bless your hearts. You may be embarrassed by these FACTS (you should be), but you certainly can't deny their validity. The fact that you continue to gaslight just makes it clear how desperate you are to deflect and obfuscate. Too late.

So you continue to demonstrate that you can’t distinguish between fact & opinion. And equity & “CRT”.

Newsflash: the WSJ isn't going to publish an opinion piece that isn't factual. Just so you know. And you clearly did NOT read the previous posts, describing exactly what was taught in the teacher trainings. No one is equating equity to CRT. You can continue spewing your nonsense in the hope that no one else will bother reading the previous posts. Good luck to you and your attempts to gaslight.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What are you talking about OP? A little more serious discussion and comment, please, or this will be reported as a troll post.

I'm saying I thought CRT was a thing, how come its not talked about more after the election.

Because they whipped up some hysteria using lies about CRT, used it for their own games to get what they wanted (votes, power, and furthering their own agenda) and moved on to new lies, such as litter boxes in middle school bathrooms.

And they DGAF about the kids who will be hurt in the process.

Vile POSs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What are you talking about OP? A little more serious discussion and comment, please, or this will be reported as a troll post.

I'm saying I thought CRT was a thing, how come its not talked about more after the election.

Because they whipped up some hysteria using lies about CRT, used it for their own games to get what they wanted (votes, power, and furthering their own agenda) and moved on to new lies, such as litter boxes in middle school bathrooms.