Reply to So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "So what happened to that "CRT" Youngkin and his voters were talking about"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Funny how liberals are desperate to discredit the FACTS posted by the WSJ in previous posts as "propaganda."  Bless your hearts.  You may be embarrassed by these FACTS (you should be), but you certainly can't deny their validity.  The fact that you continue to gaslight just makes it clear how desperate you are to deflect and obfuscate.  Too late. [/quote]

So you continue to demonstrate that you can’t distinguish between fact & opinion. And equity & “CRT”.

[/quote]

Here you go, hon.  Since you continue to demonstrate that you can't read.  CRT in a nutshell - and labeled as such.

Documents emailed from 2019 to 2021 by Pacific Educational Group to district administrators in advance of various training seminars cite critical race theory explicitly. A rubric dated Feb. 4, 2020, encourages participants to “Deconstruct the Presence and role of Whiteness” in their lives. A March 17, 2020, presentation lists “aspects and assumptions of white culture” in the U.S. Some are negative, such as “win at all costs,” “wealth = worth,” “don’t show emotion,” and in reference to food, “bland is best.” Others are seemingly universal principles such as “cause-and-effect relationships,” “objective, rational, linear thinking,” and “plan for future.”

That presentation also spells out the “5 tenets of critical race theory” to “better understand the critical intersection of race and schooling.” One tenet is the “permanence of racism,” or the idea that “racism is endemic to all our institutions, systems and structures” in the U.S. Another is “whiteness as property.” The “critique of liberalism” tenet argues that “colorblindness,” “neutrality of the law” and the “myth of meritocracy” must be “deconstructed.”

These tenets aren’t presented as abstract notions for faculty to consider, but ideas they’re meant to apply. School staff’s ability to use “critical race theory . . . to inform racial equity leadership and analysis of school policies, practices and procedures” is considered a sign of the successful “internalization and application” of Pacific Educational Group’s framework. [b]And a chart includes “Critical Race Theory” [/b]as a step toward “Equity/Anti-Racism School Transformation Action Planning.” A Feb. 3, 2021,[b] seminar is even titled “Using Critical Race Theory to Transform Leadership and District.”
[/b]
Perhaps districts like Tredyffrin-Easttown think they can shoo parents away by making a distinction between teacher training and curriculum. But what is the point of teacher training if not to inform teachers on how they should teach?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/if-students-dont-lear...ors-students-class-11662150413[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics