Reply to Mt Holyoke vs Tufts

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Mt Holyoke vs Tufts"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]FWIW: At Mount Holyoke, all of the top recruiters came to campus.[/quote]

I'm sure Wall Street and the big consulting firms are filled with MHC grads.

Sarcasm aside, Wellesley is the only Seven Sister to have a credible presence in the world of finance recruiting.

The stats of incoming classes at MCH is significantly below Wellesley or Tufts. It is what it is. It doesn't mean MHC isn't a good college, for it is a good college. But it is not going to open the same doors as going to Tufts or Wellesley would. Career fairs with a token representative isn't the same as a serious recruitment funnel. And that's fine. It's how the world works. [/quote]

I don;t know why people get so defensive when schools are compared. As someone from from New England, Tufts and MHC are not even in the same conversation. Smith and MHC are a step below Wellesley and Tufts is a step above all 3. [/quote]

What does this even mean? A step above or below at what?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics