Reply to Quarantining entire classrooms at ES level

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Quarantining entire classrooms at ES level "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If my kid classroom get quarantined for 10 days due to a positive kid, can my kid go outdoor to play, go to doctor appointment, go to my workplace, or he/she has to stay home for 10 days?[/quote]

Yes, kid should stay home in this scenario (unless sick and needed doc of course). If they could just go anywhere they wouldn’t be quarantined and could go to school. [/quote]

This rule is so unclear. Also, if one of your kids gets quarantined for a positive case in their class, it does not mean any of your other kids need to enter quarantine which makes no sense to me. If mcps is so worried your child who was exposed could contract covid then why do they allow other members of that same household to attend school while their sibling is at home potentially harboring covid?[/quote]

Maybe they’re hoping parents will use common sense? Unlike the parents who brought their child to soccer this morning when I know their youngest’s class is quarantined because of a positive in their classroom. [/quote]

Well according to mcps their older kid doesn’t need to quarantine and can attend school. So I can see why the parents think it is ok to bring their older child to soccer.   I don’t agree dog this rule at all but I get why you’d think your older kid can continue life as normal if they are allowed back at school. [/quote]

100% positive that the child who was participating in soccer was quarantined due to exposure in the classroom. It wasn’t a misinterpretation of the rule by the parent. It was willful ignoring. [/quote]

I thought parents were supposed to use common sense. The soccer player was in MCPS quarantine as part of a class, not as a close contact. The parents' had no reason to think he was a legitimate close contact, and certainly had no reason to think he was infected. And if he was infected, he might not be infectious. And if he was infectious, soccer is presumably outside where transmissions would be rare anyway.

Common sense would dictate that child isn't a greater transmission risk to others on the team as many, many others others that the teammates would interact with on a daily basis.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics