Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Do you think women are more attractive now or in the past?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I think the aspirational beauty norms are unquestionably higher today. However, it is a double-edge sword because they have ruled out any human, natural signs of aging or even imperfection. Go watch any Abba music videos and remember that these ladies were very much a beauty norm of their time. What do you see? Normal color teeth, some minor crookedness, natural skin texture, with pores and minor wrinkles, gravity-affected breasts and upper arms, some flab on thighs. Yes beautiful but completely human. Today, none of that can fly. If you aim for aspirational beauty norms today, you cannot have pores. You cannot have breasts pointing down, no matter what size. No part of your body is allowed to jiggle at all. You must have muscles. Your teeth must be perfectly straight and white. You cannot have an ounce of fat anywhere on your body. Any of these would kick you out of the beauty ranks. In other words, you are not allowed to be imperfect or to age. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
