Reply to Always get a prenup if you have something to protect

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Always get a prenup if you have something to protect"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]I disagree. Your brother basically was planning for the marriage to fail and it did. What a surprise.[/b]

My IL’s demanded I sign a prenup. I said NO. They said the6 weren’t coming to the wedding.

We have been married 20 year and all the prenup issues did was alienate my in laws from us and our kids. 
I moved away from them as soon as I could. 
I am in it for the long haul.[/quote]

1. You must be a woman.
2. You must be stupid.

A prenup has nothing to do with the marriage.  It has to do with the man's family.  If my son marries a woman and they get divorced, I do not want the money I WORKED HARD FOR to go to her.  Understand?[/quote]

If it is good enough for the royal family, it is good enough for PP
http://www.businessinsider.com/prince-harry-meghan-markle-prenup-2018-3

"Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are set to wed in May 2018— but they're skipping a step many modern couples take to protect their finances in the case of divorce. 
According to the Daily Mail, Prince Harry and Markle aren't signing a prenuptial agreement. In fact, Prince Harry's older brother Prince William also didn't sign a prenup before marrying Kate Middleton in 2011, Fox News reported. 
For the average American couple, this might be a dangerous choice. But for couples in the UK, it's somewhat expected. 
Prenups were only introduced in the United Kingdom fairly recently — and they're still not very popular. 
In a 2010 ruling, the Supreme Court held that "courts should give effect to a pre-nuptial agreement that is freely entered into by each party, with a full appreciation of its implications," unless it would be unfair to the parties, according to a 2017 briefing paper from the House of Commons. 
Before that, prenups were not always enforceable in the UK. In fact, said Harriet Cohen, a partner at Cohen Rabin Stine Schumann LLP, a family law firm in New York City, prenups were considered "non-romantic." "[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics