Reply to It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . .

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "It seems like every 'supermodel' is the daughter of a celebrity these days . . . "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Kendall Jenner is naturally beautiful and built like a model. Her covers and ads are gorgeous, and she's great on the runway. [/quote]

She is plain. She is not "creature" like or extraordinary, she's just tall.[/quote]

Well, apparently the fashion industry disagrees. [/quote]

Actually it famously agrees and she has been bullied for model "inadequacies" but where there is money to be made, everyone is a whore in that business.[/quote]

Huh. August 2016 Vogue says she's the breakout model of her generation...and she's on multiple covers around the globe this month and next.

People are hating because she's linked to the Kardashians. And that's not really fair. She's pretty, has a model's figure, and is doing well in the industry.

I realize she's not everyone's cup of tea, but neither were the supermodels back in the day. I always thought Kate Moss looked rather ordinary. I always thought Cindy Crawford and Elle McPherson were gorgeous, but they weren't very model-y (more "hot girl nextdoor" than anorexic heroin-chic glamazon).

Kendall looks like a model. She has the body and striking facial features coupled with the vacant look. [/quote]

She’s pretty. Nothing special.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics