Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "UVA Gang rape"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]WTF? The Charlottesville police have not yet even begun to investigate formally? Who is going to step in first, the state police or Anonymous? Whether you have doubts about the RS article or not, the reputation of the state university is taking a huge hit and there needs to be light on this.... http://time.com/3616263/uva-rape-investigation/[/quote] "Police had previously confirmed that UVA President Teresa Sullivan had contacted the department to request a criminal investigation and said they were reviewing a published account of the alleged incident. But police have not yet accumulated enough information to take the matter beyond an inquiry and open a formal investigation." Because Jackie will not work with police they cannot advance this past an inquiry.[/quote] Wow you are incorrigible. The article does not say that Jackie will not work with the police. How much does UVa pay you for each time you attack the victim?[/quote] You realize that your paranoia and absurd speculation that someone is paying people to comment on a minor anonymous website makes you sound less than debate-worthy, don't you?[/quote] Where's your published support? Trying to distract from the fact that you have none?[/quote] What, you don't trust unnamed sources when he/she makes an allegation? My word isn't good enough for you? Seems ironic. But let's say for a minute I don't know for a fact that she's not participating ... are you then of the belief that the Cville police are also complicit in the denial of Jackie's story and the obstruction of justice for the rapists? Because certainly if she had been participating and had named an accuser there would be more than an inquiry at this point. There would be a formal investigation, and we most likely would know the subjects of the investigation. Or is even the police department, under all this national (actually, global) attention, also willfully preventing the pursuit of justice by declining to elevate their inquiry to a formal investigation? Weeks later, and Jackie - who you deny is not cooperating - has named her assailants and still no investigation has been started nor suspects accused. That is your position? You must have aced Logic 101 in college.[/quote] As a lawyer, I know there could be a many reasons that an inquiry has not progressed and you posting repeatedly it is because Jackie is not participating not as opinion but as if it were a fact is a form of attacking the victim. That is pretty basic logic. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics