Reply to Special Counsel Report on Classified Documents

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Special Counsel Report on Classified Documents"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What’s wild is that the conjecture in the report about Biden’s memory and mental faculties would never hold up in a court of law and likely be stricken from the record if the Hur made the same statement in open court. Hur is not a trained medical professional, no doctor was observing the interview on behalf of DoJ. To try to make some sort of diagnosis of the President is wildly unprofessional and way below an elite lawyer who is a partner at Gibson Dunn and went to Stanford Law.

The fact that this made it in the report issued by DoJ is insane. That’s how you know Hur is a nakedly Republican political operative. [/quote]

Hur made no diagnosis. 
He stated what he observed.  And, he confirmed what we have all seen for 3 years now. 
And, it has only gotten worse.  And, it will continue to get worse.  His issues will NOT improve. 
Those of you who cannot admit that are divorced from reality.  [/quote]

It was unprofessional for Hur to throw out non-germane opinions that are not in the report. And he did not include those gossipy insults in the report because that would have been outrageously unprofessional. Hur disgraced himself. [/quote]

He had to include them because that was his excuse for not charging him.  [/quote]

The report explained that there were no charges because of lack of evidence of knowledge or intent. His speech relating his personal animosity for Biden was irrelevant and unprofessional. [/quote]

Please pay attention. 'Lack of evidence of knowledge or intent' means Joe is senile so he doesn't remember period. What is so hard to understand about that? He definitely was not senile when he was in the Senate so Biden should have been charged for the classified documents he took when he was a senator.[/quote]
Dp- bulls—t
Hur couldn’t find evidence and in fact in the report states he did find evidence in the affirmative, that there was no intent.
He didn’t have the goods, so insulted the president on behalf of MAGA land[/quote]

Explain the beginning of his report.....

"Mr. Biden willfully retained marked classified documents about Afghanistan and unmarked classified handwritten notes in his notebook, both of which he stored in unsecured places in his home."

"Willfully" means:
1.with the intention of causing harm; deliberately.
2. with a stubborn and determined intention to do as one wants, regardless of the consequences.

How is this not "with intent" or not proof.  Hur chose the word "willfully" for a reason.  
Please stop the gaslighting.  
[/quote]

his staff removed boxes from his office and put it in his garage where it sat for years. That is inly willful in the sense that someone willfully moved a box. Also there were no documents marked classified the way there are for Trump. These were mostly private handwritten notes.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics