Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Van Hollen in El Salvador "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Since the media has decided this thug is their poster child for wrongful deportation, maybe they can invite Kilmar Abrego Garcia to live on their street and carry out his gang activities in their neighborhood.[/quote] He was checking in with ICE and was in a union as a construction employee. He had 3 kids and a wife.absolutely no proof ever of any gang membership or affiliation. Honestly doesn’t seem that scary of a guy. Are you this afraid of everyone? [/quote] The evidence of his gang membership has been provided over and over. One kid is his. The other two are his wife’s - the one who had two separate domestic violence claims against him.[/quote] No it hasn't, and sorry internet warrior, a judge decided that there was no evidence of gang involvement. Stop cherry picking and pretending your internet searches are more thorough than the evidence a judge was presented with, [/quote] Look above and read the links and the court papers. Stop referring to one judge - - there were several including the court of appeals. Again, this evidence was provided over and over.[/quote] OPf course there was more than one judge and hearing. And you ae choosing to represent the ones that were basically overturned by the last judge. There is no evidence.[/quote] The later judge didn’t overturn anything - he couldn’t because the appeals court had already determined evidence of gang membership!! Do you understand how appeals courts work? The later judge simply said he couldn’t go to ES because as MS 13, he was scared of Barrio’s gang reprisal. Thing is, that gang (Barrio) doesn’t even exist any more because ES squashed them.[/quote] He couldn’t go to El Salvador because he was a member of a social class based on his affiliation with his mother, whose successful business was being extorted by the gangs at threat of murdering and raping her children, and that social class could not be altered. Thus he was granted nexus of protection. Had nothing to do with being in MS13 which he was not. He came here at 16 to avoid murder by the Barrio 18 gang or having to join another gang for protection. [/quote] That’s his story, sure. El S may think otherwise. Barrio doesn’t exist anymore. [/quote] I’m curious if there’s a reason you absolutely refuse to type out the entire name of this country. El S? ES? It’s not commonly known by either. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics