Reply to OJ simpson Died

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "OJ simpson Died"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]They were able to bring top of the line scientists and forensic experts to explain how EDTA isn’t man made and how two human stabbings leading to no blood in the getaway vehicle or home  is absurd and not humanly possible. Stabbings of the chest are basically as bloody and messy as open heart surgery.

The jury made the right decision . The prosecutions entire case relied on the cops /Furhman and his racist tapes , the missing blood from the vial, and the EDTA found on the sock ruined it.

Usually, someone without OJ’s money , like a Scott Peterson is screwed when it comes to fighting the police detectives work but OJ went broke to hire the best of the best 
[/quote]

Why on earth would the police try to pin a heinous murder on Scott Peterson? Wouldn’t they be more concerned about public safety, when there was a deranged lunatic running around snatching up pregnant women and murdering them?

The police try to solve crimes to keep the public safe. Yes, sometimes they’re corrupt, but most of the time, they are looking to solve crimes and get dangerous perpetrators off the streets. They had nothing to gain from railroading Scott Peterson.

Your comment make me wish there was an iq test for having children and voting. [/quote]

I think you’re the one in need of an Iq test and your brain examined . If you had a problem with your neighbor Suzie, and Suzie perishes, if no leads or traces  come in, you will become a suspect just because you once had a contentious history with Suzie. It’s enough for someone to build motive even if no forensic evidence is on the scene tying you to it. Cops’ jobs are to pin it on someone. They will even find eyewitnesses who will say you were there even if you weren’t there because people naturally skew their memories to help the police since they’re the so called good guys.

“Wrong place, wrong time” has convicted many innocent people.   Scott going fishing and Nicole’s exaggerated  diaries for spousal support don’t mean they did the crimes. Only the forensic evidence on the scene  can prove that. There is no forensics tying Scott or OJ to the deaths and no hair, blood, or clothing of the victims in their homes. Do you know how long and how personal a strangulation and stabbing is? Skin, sweat, fingerprints, blood, clothing , hair would be all over the place .

Do you know many thousands of people are getting their convictions overturned for crimes they didn’t ever commit ? It simply is because they had the last conflict with the victim that cops pin it on them and plant  the evidence/make the states case  . The burden of proof is on the state to find a suspect, convict, and sentence.

Conviction rates are how sherriffs get elected and judges  and prosecutors as well . The truth is most people that kill are expert enough to leave no obvious trace behind but having so many cold cases/murder mysteries are just a bad look for any district so they need to be wrapped up and solved.

In reality, it often takes years to actually crack a case. Rushing things is what causes bad police work and detective work. [/quote]

Please stop, you are really dumb and only making people feel sorry for you.

No man goes fishing on Christmas Eve when his wife is eight months pregnant. The fact that you don’t get that speaks to your stupidity. You don’t need CSI type evidence to convict someone of murder. You do realize people used to get convicted for crimes before DNA was a thing, right?!?!

In Scott Peterson’s case and in OJ’s it was the totality of all of the “coincidences” that proved their guilt to anyone with a sliver of common sense.

You see yourself as an advocate for the wrongfully accused, but you are just a simpleton with absolutely no common sense.[/quote]

Men also shouldn’t cheat when their wives are pregnant or at all. Scott wasn’t the doting type obviously. He would absolutely be the type to go fishing . Laci was also mopping the kitchen at eight months pregnant before he left. What a Prince , right?

That’s still not enough to convict.

Why are you making it about me instead of the posts I’ve presented from various witnesses, authors, and experts?

Can anyone explain why the cops didn’t look into that home being burglarized that Laci possibly crossed  paths with , and the EDTA , sealed phone records of Nicole from that evening  , and Ron’s criminal record being sealed because he was a confidential informant .[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics