Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hey Raging Heart dude, of course, Nicole was acting out, she was married to a narcissistic abuser who made her life a living hell and then ultimately killed her.

Who wouldn’t act out under the circumstances? See how put together you’d be in her shoes, much younger, much poorer, family ready to pump her out, no place to run, constant gaslighting and self-doubt. Most people would probably turn to drugs, too.

I wish I believed in hell. That is where that scumbag, wife beater belongs.

Drugs or no drugs, she was a piece of work when alive. Her own friends and family told all those bad stories in the book. The books premise was showing her scandalous side as if to say that’s why Oj was incensed enough to kill her.

It just is odd that OJ isn’t the one saying these bad things about her . It’s her so called friends

Let’s assume OJ was innocent (in your dreams), he beat the sh-t out of Nicole on multiple occasions. It’s documented. Who cares what he did or didn’t say about her? He abused her in every way possible.

The only piece of work is you, libeling an abused wife who has been dead for 30 years. You’re a disgusting piece of work.

Did she go to the hospital? He never beat the shit out of her. Nicole’s own parents told Marcia Clark she lied and exaggerated DV claims to try and get more spousal support. In the 1993 call, Nicole says OJ hadn’t hit her in 4 years since 1989 and it only happened one time. OJ also added to the settlement a clause that if he ever put his hand on Nicole again, he would pay her 5 million dollars. A stupid idea. That’s probably why she kept stalking his girlfriends and called 911 in 1993.

You really don’t know anything about domestic violence, do you?

Do you think she deserved to be beaten? Do you think it was ok that she made him so mad he killed her?

She hit him first. In her therapy notes and in the Divorce case (many components of which are also sealed), she talks about her temper as well.

Nobody knows who killed her. Everyone’s so sure Oj did it but you weren’t there and I wasn’t there either so you don’t know that he did it.

Circumstantial evidence isn’t compelling. Scott cheated on Laci. Oj hit Nicole.

So what? What’s the evidence on the actual scenes? Both victims got down and fought bravely and hard with their attacker for over 5-10 minutes. There should be a pot full of DNA evidence, hairs, blood, fingerprints all over their bodies.

OJ should’ve have blood on his eyelashes and all over his feet and hands after two stabbings of that magnitude . His Bronco having 1/8 of 1 drop of blood makes no sense. His white fixtures and wall to wall carpeting in his room and his sink and bathroom would be covered in blood. How would he kill people, not get mauled to death by the dog, clean up, get home without leaving a trace (except for a glove and sock) , get the Bronco cleaned , and get in the Limo to the airport in 20 minutes?

Is he Superman?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wonder if this will bring the Goldman family a sense of peace or closure.

There is no closure or peace when a loved one is murdered. I'm sure you mean well but it is a stupid and insensitive thing to say. As for Simpson. I'll be back in 48 hours!

Surely the 48 hour rule should be waived for this one.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They were able to bring top of the line scientists and forensic experts to explain how EDTA isn’t man made and how two human stabbings leading to no blood in the getaway vehicle or home is absurd and not humanly possible. Stabbings of the chest are basically as bloody and messy as open heart surgery.

The jury made the right decision . The prosecutions entire case relied on the cops /Furhman and his racist tapes , the missing blood from the vial, and the EDTA found on the sock ruined it.

Usually, someone without OJ’s money , like a Scott Peterson is screwed when it comes to fighting the police detectives work but OJ went broke to hire the best of the best

Why on earth would the police try to pin a heinous murder on Scott Peterson? Wouldn’t they be more concerned about public safety, when there was a deranged lunatic running around snatching up pregnant women and murdering them?

The police try to solve crimes to keep the public safe. Yes, sometimes they’re corrupt, but most of the time, they are looking to solve crimes and get dangerous perpetrators off the streets. They had nothing to gain from railroading Scott Peterson.

Your comment make me wish there was an iq test for having children and voting.

I think you’re the one in need of an Iq test and your brain examined . If you had a problem with your neighbor Suzie, and Suzie perishes, if no leads or traces come in, you will become a suspect just because you once had a contentious history with Suzie. It’s enough for someone to build motive even if no forensic evidence is on the scene tying you to it. Cops’ jobs are to pin it on someone. They will even find eyewitnesses who will say you were there even if you weren’t there because people naturally skew their memories to help the police since they’re the so called good guys.

“Wrong place, wrong time” has convicted many innocent people. Scott going fishing and Nicole’s exaggerated diaries for spousal support don’t mean they did the crimes. Only the forensic evidence on the scene can prove that. There is no forensics tying Scott or OJ to the deaths and no hair, blood, or clothing of the victims in their homes. Do you know how long and how personal a strangulation and stabbing is? Skin, sweat, fingerprints, blood, clothing , hair would be all over the place .

Do you know many thousands of people are getting their convictions overturned for crimes they didn’t ever commit ? It simply is because they had the last conflict with the victim that cops pin it on them and plant the evidence/make the states case . The burden of proof is on the state to find a suspect, convict, and sentence.

Conviction rates are how sherriffs get elected and judges and prosecutors as well . The truth is most people that kill are expert enough to leave no obvious trace behind but having so many cold cases/murder mysteries are just a bad look for any district so they need to be wrapped up and solved.

In reality, it often takes years to actually crack a case. Rushing things is what causes bad police work and detective work.

Please stop, you are really dumb and only making people feel sorry for you.

No man goes fishing on Christmas Eve when his wife is eight months pregnant. The fact that you don’t get that speaks to your stupidity. You don’t need CSI type evidence to convict someone of murder. You do realize people used to get convicted for crimes before DNA was a thing, right?!?!

In Scott Peterson’s case and in OJ’s it was the totality of all of the “coincidences” that proved their guilt to anyone with a sliver of common sense.

You see yourself as an advocate for the wrongfully accused, but you are just a simpleton with absolutely no common sense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They were able to bring top of the line scientists and forensic experts to explain how EDTA isn’t man made and how two human stabbings leading to no blood in the getaway vehicle or home is absurd and not humanly possible. Stabbings of the chest are basically as bloody and messy as open heart surgery.

The jury made the right decision . The prosecutions entire case relied on the cops /Furhman and his racist tapes , the missing blood from the vial, and the EDTA found on the sock ruined it.

Usually, someone without OJ’s money , like a Scott Peterson is screwed when it comes to fighting the police detectives work but OJ went broke to hire the best of the best

Why on earth would the police try to pin a heinous murder on Scott Peterson? Wouldn’t they be more concerned about public safety, when there was a deranged lunatic running around snatching up pregnant women and murdering them?

The police try to solve crimes to keep the public safe. Yes, sometimes they’re corrupt, but most of the time, they are looking to solve crimes and get dangerous perpetrators off the streets. They had nothing to gain from railroading Scott Peterson.

Your comment make me wish there was an iq test for having children and voting.

I think you’re the one in need of an Iq test and your brain examined . If you had a problem with your neighbor Suzie, and Suzie perishes, if no leads or traces come in, you will become a suspect just because you once had a contentious history with Suzie. It’s enough for someone to build motive even if no forensic evidence is on the scene tying you to it. Cops’ jobs are to pin it on someone. They will even find eyewitnesses who will say you were there even if you weren’t there because people naturally skew their memories to help the police since they’re the so called good guys.

“Wrong place, wrong time” has convicted many innocent people. Scott going fishing and Nicole’s exaggerated diaries for spousal support don’t mean they did the crimes. Only the forensic evidence on the scene can prove that. There is no forensics tying Scott or OJ to the deaths and no hair, blood, or clothing of the victims in their homes. Do you know how long and how personal a strangulation and stabbing is? Skin, sweat, fingerprints, blood, clothing , hair would be all over the place .

Do you know many thousands of people are getting their convictions overturned for crimes they didn’t ever commit ? It simply is because they had the last conflict with the victim that cops pin it on them and plant the evidence/make the states case . The burden of proof is on the state to find a suspect, convict, and sentence.

Conviction rates are how sherriffs get elected and judges and prosecutors as well . The truth is most people that kill are expert enough to leave no obvious trace behind but having so many cold cases/murder mysteries are just a bad look for any district so they need to be wrapped up and solved.

In reality, it often takes years to actually crack a case. Rushing things is what causes bad police work and detective work.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did you also know If I Did It was ghostwritten by Nicole’s neighbor Pablo Fenjes who testified for the prosecution? OJ was broke at the time and needed a shock value book to sell. It wasn’t even written by him. It was written completely by Nicole’s ex neighbor who wanted cash also

With very few exceptions, all celebrity books are ghostwritten. OJ told his story to Pablo Fenjes, who was a screenwriter and a frequent ghostwriter. Judith Regan and Pablo Fenjes both claim that OJ was interviewed extensively for the book. (Only OJ’s manager later said he wasn’t involved.)

Judith Regan lost her job at Harper Collins over it. That’s how egregious the whole project was. Why?

Because OJ details how he committed the crimes. There could have been a camera crew following him, taking him committing the murders, and you still wouldn’t believe it. You are hopeless, PP.

Oj never told this story . He was broke.

Ron’s family are also co-authors of this book. They make money from If I Did it as well.

All of the people in this case are scummy. The Brown family and Ojs kids are the only ones who act with class .

Simpson's former manager, Norman Pardo, claimed that Simpson was not involved in writing the book but rather accepted $600,000 to say he had written it and to conduct an interview

Ron’s family were not coauthors of the book. They were not remotely involved in this foul project. They were awarded all proceeds from the book to stop OJ from profiting from it.

You are beyond offensive and STUPID.

Anonymous wrote:It’s one of the MRA incel Trumpers who’ve made their way to this forum to rail against the “leftist” NPR. They will believe almost anything/anyone, as long as it’s anti-woman.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They were able to bring top of the line scientists and forensic experts to explain how EDTA isn’t man made and how two human stabbings leading to no blood in the getaway vehicle or home is absurd and not humanly possible. Stabbings of the chest are basically as bloody and messy as open heart surgery.

The jury made the right decision . The prosecutions entire case relied on the cops /Furhman and his racist tapes , the missing blood from the vial, and the EDTA found on the sock ruined it.

Usually, someone without OJ’s money , like a Scott Peterson is screwed when it comes to fighting the police detectives work but OJ went broke to hire the best of the best

Why on earth would the police try to pin a heinous murder on Scott Peterson? Wouldn’t they be more concerned about public safety, when there was a deranged lunatic running around snatching up pregnant women and murdering them?

The police try to solve crimes to keep the public safe. Yes, sometimes they’re corrupt, but most of the time, they are looking to solve crimes and get dangerous perpetrators off the streets. They had nothing to gain from railroading Scott Peterson.

Your comment make me wish there was an iq test for having children and voting.