Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Everyone who questioned why Burke went to Megyn Kelly, just take a look at the article TMZ just put out. It’s far more tame than what Burke said (as someone pointed out in the comments) which shows mainstream media is bought and paid for. My guess is Leslie got to the and carefully negotiated the wording. It waters down what Burke said. Such a disgrace. Hope that answers your questions about why go on Megyn Kelly. [/quote]

No. TMZ is just a celeb tabloid. That's not it either.

She could have gone on any one of the legal podcasts that discuss the intersection of law and feminism. I am positive they would have had her. It would have gotten traction with people following this case no matter where because it's a big story. Choosing Megyn Kelly, who has a close relationship with Freedman and who actively opposes the MeToo movement is a very intentional choice. I don't get it. [/quote]

You don't understand why she would pick a show with a big audience?  Be real.  An esoteric legal podcast is not going to get her message out.[/quote]

There are other shows with big audiences where the host doesn't support Harvey Weinstein or defend Jeffrey Epstein.[/quote]

Clearly she doesn't have the same super restrictive purity meter as you. [/quote]

Are you the one who just claimed that the entire mainstream media is in Blake's pocket, making a Harvey Weinstein apologist the only acceptable venue for this?

But i'm the one bring overly restrictive. Hmmm

She could have issued a press release clearly laying out her position and it would have been picked up by everyone. She also could have filed an amended custody brief with the court. She had a million options. She chose Megyn Kelly, a Bryan Freedman client who recently claimed it unfair to call Epstein a pedophile because he was into teenagers and not pre-pubescent children. She chose that.[/quote]

Yep she could’ve issued a press release. Oh that’s right she posted on social media 4 days ago and no one picked it up. When Megyn Kelly shared it and it became something they couldn’t ignore, they framed it in the light most favorable to Blake. [/quote]

She didn't post to social media in a public way. She responded to something else with a comment that in retrospect was confusing, it was outed in one of Flaa's videos, and then within a few hours she was appearing on Megyn Kelly.

It seems like she had no intention of taking this public at all but then wound up choosing weird venues for doing so.

I also think she was unprepared for the kind of interview Kelly was inevitably going to do (she has a very specific agenda and it is NOT supportive of the cause) which is what led to the Johnny Depp comments.

Basically it was messy chaos, which is why many people are confused.[/quote]

I think she is trying to reach Liman's ears.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics