Reply to By the numbers: A dispassioned evaluation of Hardy (compared to Deal and Wilson)

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "By the numbers: A dispassioned evaluation of Hardy (compared to Deal and Wilson)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Parents of the Hardy feeder schools are relieved that the proposal for Hyde to be swung to Hardy has been taken off the table.  That would have killed the momentum toward Hardy growing its in-boundary population.  It was a crazy idea to begin with and weird that DCPS ever entertained it.[/quote]

Not crazy.  Dcps wants hardy to be majority oob. There is simply no other explanation for their inept management of hardy over the past decade. I guarantee you that the real reason they want to kick out fillmore is to make room for more oob kids at hardy.[/quote]

Well, Kaya Henderson is gone now, so maybe the urge to offend the high-SES citizens has been weakened.  One City!![/quote]

The proposal was fake entertained to let Jack Evans pretend he was fighting for some constituents... it was never for real. Like all those ones Mary Chehimi throws around that are big jokes on the face of them. [/quote]

You have no idea what you are talking about. Jake Evans never took a stand against the proposal of hosting Hyde on Hardy's outdoor space. The proposal would have negatively affected very few of his Ward 2 constituents, i.e. just the Ward 2 Hardy IB families. The proposal was for real, and it was withdrawn only because of the strong opposition which was mounting in the Ward 3 Hardy feeder school communities as soon as they learned of the proposal. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics