Reply to ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "ICE Shooting in Minneapolis "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Independent autopsy has been done. Bullet wounds to right chest, right arm, head, and a graze wound (news didn't say where).

Depending on where the shot to her head was, the rest could have been survivable I would think--blood stopping products advanced a ton during the ME wars. [/quote]
The third shot killed her. THIRD! He’ll be tried for murder. Bring back public hangings.[/quote]

[twitter]https://x.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/2014211123046973533[/twitter]

Explain how you get around Alito's 9-0 decision in Plumhoff.

Here's a reminder:

"We now consider respondent’s contention that, even if the use of deadly force was permissible, petitioners acted unreasonably in firing a total of 15 shots. We reject that argument. [b]It stands to reason that, if police officers are justified in firing at a suspect in order to end a severe threat to public safety, the officers need not stop shooting until the threat has ended. As petitioners noted below, “if lethal force is justified, officers are taught to keep shooting until the threat is over.”
[/b]
9-0.  Including RBG, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan.

Take it up with them.[/quote]
A threat to public safety is not the same as a threat to the officer. The argument in this case is that he was shooting to protect HIMSELF, not anyone else. The case you cited is irrelevant.[/quote]
A person who turned her vehicle towards the officer and accelerated to flee the scene, IS a threat to the public.[/quote]

A person who turned her car AWAY from the officer and proceeded at the outrageously dangerous speed of 2mph.[/quote]

Thankfully, she was prevented from going any faster and hitting someone in her path.  [/quote]
She literally went faster and hit something only after he put a bullet in her brain, not before.[/quote]

You guys can debate, postulate and deliberate ad nauseam about what you think happened and what you think SHOULD have happened.  
But, the only thing that matters is what the ICE officer that her car was headed for was thinking.  That is all.  
He will not be charged with any crime because he did not commit one.  
The real shame is had she simply followed the officer's orders to get out of the car, she would be alive.  How many times do people have to be told to FOLLOW THE COMMANDS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT.  You can take your case to a judge later.  [/quote]

ICE is not the police. They have specific authority and jurisdiction. They don't get to attempt to drag people put of their cars. And they don't get to get in the way then claim self defense and shoot you in the face. This agent has a PATTERN of this behavior. He is a murderer. And there's no statute of limitations on murder. If this administration doesn't hold him accountable, any future administration still could. And if the government chooses not to enforce order and justice, he can look over his shoulder for the rest of his life fearing the day when street justice comes his way. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics