Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 07:34     Subject: ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:there were over 50,000 people there on a -9 degree day. There were hundreds of thousands of others who partook in the general strike. Yes, I would say that is impressive


So a Vikings tailgate that could happen on any cold Sunday? Got it.


You’re clearly a troll.
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 07:12     Subject: ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

At this juncture, one is either for freedom and democracry or they are supporting a totalitarian state.

Pick you side and understand, someday, your grandchildren will be asking about these times. Will you lie to them and tell them you hated Trump and MAGA and the gestapo tactics if ICE or will that be the truth?
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 07:10     Subject: ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

there were over 50,000 people there on a -9 degree day. There were hundreds of thousands of others who partook in the general strike. Yes, I would say that is impressive
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 07:08     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It is negative 9 degrees in Minneapolis. This is how pissed off they are:



Is this supposed to be impressive?


Try this view instead. Yeah, I’d say it’s impressive.

Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 07:06     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:It is negative 9 degrees in Minneapolis. This is how pissed off they are:



Is this supposed to be impressive?
Anonymous
Post 01/24/2026 07:01     Subject: ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous
Post 01/23/2026 22:00     Subject: ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

FBI supervisor in Minneapolis office of FBI resigns after trying to investigate ICE murder of Renee Good.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/23/us/fbi-agent-ice-shooting-renee-good.html?smid=nytcore-android-share
Anonymous
Post 01/23/2026 19:30     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Independent autopsy has been done. Bullet wounds to right chest, right arm, head, and a graze wound (news didn't say where).

Depending on where the shot to her head was, the rest could have been survivable I would think--blood stopping products advanced a ton during the ME wars.


It’s impossible to determine if she could have survived this. Did anyone have a trauma kit or IFAK? They’d need at least one chest seal and a CAT tourniquet. A chest dart would likely be necessary to treat a tension pneumothorax. How quickly did medics get there? QuikClot only does so much.


There was a doctor on the scene. ICE would not let him attend to her. When the medics showed up, they wouldn’t let them drive the ambulance to her so they had to park nearby and walk in


It was a crime scene. In situations like this EMS always needs to defer to law enforcement. None of that is out of the ordinary.

A doctor without a trauma kit would be useless.


ICE do not have the legal authority to restrict municipal EMS from attending to a patient.


In fact, it is a crime to prevent EMS from attending a victim
Municipal EMS? It was someone on the street claiming to be a doctor.


ICE impeded both the doctor and the EMS


The doctor had a whistle, not a trauma kit. There was nothing they could do.

They didn’t block EMS, they had them walk into the scene. They did walk in. Sometimes EMS has to walk a ways.


Nobody knew that at the time. Doctors know where to apply pressure on arteries - in some cases this can save a life.

ICE people can't even pass open book tests.


Multiple GSWs aren’t treated simply by applying pressure.

Was the doctor a dermatologist, or a dentist?


They knew how many bullets had hit her? They knew where?


They didn't know how many bullets or where.

They didn't even check on her.

They kept medical professionals from checking on her.

They let her bleed out and die.
Anonymous
Post 01/23/2026 19:19     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Independent autopsy has been done. Bullet wounds to right chest, right arm, head, and a graze wound (news didn't say where).

Depending on where the shot to her head was, the rest could have been survivable I would think--blood stopping products advanced a ton during the ME wars.


It’s impossible to determine if she could have survived this. Did anyone have a trauma kit or IFAK? They’d need at least one chest seal and a CAT tourniquet. A chest dart would likely be necessary to treat a tension pneumothorax. How quickly did medics get there? QuikClot only does so much.


There was a doctor on the scene. ICE would not let him attend to her. When the medics showed up, they wouldn’t let them drive the ambulance to her so they had to park nearby and walk in


It was a crime scene. In situations like this EMS always needs to defer to law enforcement. None of that is out of the ordinary.

A doctor without a trauma kit would be useless.


ICE do not have the legal authority to restrict municipal EMS from attending to a patient.


In fact, it is a crime to prevent EMS from attending a victim
Municipal EMS? It was someone on the street claiming to be a doctor.


ICE impeded both the doctor and the EMS


The doctor had a whistle, not a trauma kit. There was nothing they could do.

They didn’t block EMS, they had them walk into the scene. They did walk in. Sometimes EMS has to walk a ways.


Nobody knew that at the time. Doctors know where to apply pressure on arteries - in some cases this can save a life.

ICE people can't even pass open book tests.


Multiple GSWs aren’t treated simply by applying pressure.

Was the doctor a dermatologist, or a dentist?

He’s a GP.

By the way you can stop defending this ahole because your god king is now saying he made a mistake.



It’s not about defending someone, it’s about dealing with nonsensical hypothetical arguments.


The only nonsense I’ve heard stems from people saying she was driving toward him so the shooting was justified, while video evidence shows she was not.
Anonymous
Post 01/23/2026 16:03     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

It is negative 9 degrees in Minneapolis. This is how pissed off they are:

Anonymous
Post 01/23/2026 15:37     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Independent autopsy has been done. Bullet wounds to right chest, right arm, head, and a graze wound (news didn't say where).

Depending on where the shot to her head was, the rest could have been survivable I would think--blood stopping products advanced a ton during the ME wars.

The third shot killed her. THIRD! He’ll be tried for murder. Bring back public hangings.




Explain how you get around Alito's 9-0 decision in Plumhoff.

Here's a reminder:

"We now consider respondent’s contention that, even if the use of deadly force was permissible, petitioners acted unreasonably in firing a total of 15 shots. We reject that argument. It stands to reason that, if police officers are justified in firing at a suspect in order to end a severe threat to public safety, the officers need not stop shooting until the threat has ended. As petitioners noted below, “if lethal force is justified, officers are taught to keep shooting until the threat is over.”

9-0. Including RBG, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan.

Take it up with them.

A threat to public safety is not the same as a threat to the officer. The argument in this case is that he was shooting to protect HIMSELF, not anyone else. The case you cited is irrelevant.

A person who turned her vehicle towards the officer and accelerated to flee the scene, IS a threat to the public.


A person who turned her car AWAY from the officer and proceeded at the outrageously dangerous speed of 2mph.


Thankfully, she was prevented from going any faster and hitting someone in her path.

She literally went faster and hit something only after he put a bullet in her brain, not before.


You guys can debate, postulate and deliberate ad nauseam about what you think happened and what you think SHOULD have happened.
But, the only thing that matters is what the ICE officer that her car was headed for was thinking. That is all.
He will not be charged with any crime because he did not commit one.
The real shame is had she simply followed the officer's orders to get out of the car, she would be alive. How many times do people have to be told to FOLLOW THE COMMANDS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT. You can take your case to a judge later.


ICE is not the police. They have specific authority and jurisdiction. They don't get to attempt to drag people put of their cars. And they don't get to get in the way then claim self defense and shoot you in the face. This agent has a PATTERN of this behavior. He is a murderer. And there's no statute of limitations on murder. If this administration doesn't hold him accountable, any future administration still could. And if the government chooses not to enforce order and justice, he can look over his shoulder for the rest of his life fearing the day when street justice comes his way.
Anonymous
Post 01/23/2026 15:30     Subject: ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Speaking of nonsensical arguments, here’s Trump’s DOJ flailing again.
Anonymous
Post 01/23/2026 13:08     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Independent autopsy has been done. Bullet wounds to right chest, right arm, head, and a graze wound (news didn't say where).

Depending on where the shot to her head was, the rest could have been survivable I would think--blood stopping products advanced a ton during the ME wars.


It’s impossible to determine if she could have survived this. Did anyone have a trauma kit or IFAK? They’d need at least one chest seal and a CAT tourniquet. A chest dart would likely be necessary to treat a tension pneumothorax. How quickly did medics get there? QuikClot only does so much.


There was a doctor on the scene. ICE would not let him attend to her. When the medics showed up, they wouldn’t let them drive the ambulance to her so they had to park nearby and walk in


It was a crime scene. In situations like this EMS always needs to defer to law enforcement. None of that is out of the ordinary.

A doctor without a trauma kit would be useless.


ICE do not have the legal authority to restrict municipal EMS from attending to a patient.


In fact, it is a crime to prevent EMS from attending a victim
Municipal EMS? It was someone on the street claiming to be a doctor.


ICE impeded both the doctor and the EMS


The doctor had a whistle, not a trauma kit. There was nothing they could do.

They didn’t block EMS, they had them walk into the scene. They did walk in. Sometimes EMS has to walk a ways.


Nobody knew that at the time. Doctors know where to apply pressure on arteries - in some cases this can save a life.

ICE people can't even pass open book tests.


Multiple GSWs aren’t treated simply by applying pressure.

Was the doctor a dermatologist, or a dentist?

He’s a GP.

By the way you can stop defending this ahole because your god king is now saying he made a mistake.



It’s not about defending someone, it’s about dealing with nonsensical hypothetical arguments.
Anonymous
Post 01/23/2026 13:02     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Independent autopsy has been done. Bullet wounds to right chest, right arm, head, and a graze wound (news didn't say where).

Depending on where the shot to her head was, the rest could have been survivable I would think--blood stopping products advanced a ton during the ME wars.

The third shot killed her. THIRD! He’ll be tried for murder. Bring back public hangings.




Explain how you get around Alito's 9-0 decision in Plumhoff.

Here's a reminder:

"We now consider respondent’s contention that, even if the use of deadly force was permissible, petitioners acted unreasonably in firing a total of 15 shots. We reject that argument. It stands to reason that, if police officers are justified in firing at a suspect in order to end a severe threat to public safety, the officers need not stop shooting until the threat has ended. As petitioners noted below, “if lethal force is justified, officers are taught to keep shooting until the threat is over.”

9-0. Including RBG, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan.

Take it up with them.

A threat to public safety is not the same as a threat to the officer. The argument in this case is that he was shooting to protect HIMSELF, not anyone else. The case you cited is irrelevant.

A person who turned her vehicle towards the officer and accelerated to flee the scene, IS a threat to the public.


A person who turned her car AWAY from the officer and proceeded at the outrageously dangerous speed of 2mph.


Thankfully, she was prevented from going any faster and hitting someone in her path.

She literally went faster and hit something only after he put a bullet in her brain, not before.


You guys can debate, postulate and deliberate ad nauseam about what you think happened and what you think SHOULD have happened.
But, the only thing that matters is what the ICE officer that her car was headed for was thinking. That is all.
He will not be charged with any crime because he did not commit one.
The real shame is had she simply followed the officer's orders to get out of the car, she would be alive. How many times do people have to be told to FOLLOW THE COMMANDS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT. You can take your case to a judge later.

The standard is not what that particular officer was thinking. The standard is what a reasonable person would be thinking.
Anonymous
Post 01/23/2026 13:01     Subject: Re:ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Independent autopsy has been done. Bullet wounds to right chest, right arm, head, and a graze wound (news didn't say where).

Depending on where the shot to her head was, the rest could have been survivable I would think--blood stopping products advanced a ton during the ME wars.


It’s impossible to determine if she could have survived this. Did anyone have a trauma kit or IFAK? They’d need at least one chest seal and a CAT tourniquet. A chest dart would likely be necessary to treat a tension pneumothorax. How quickly did medics get there? QuikClot only does so much.


There was a doctor on the scene. ICE would not let him attend to her. When the medics showed up, they wouldn’t let them drive the ambulance to her so they had to park nearby and walk in


It was a crime scene. In situations like this EMS always needs to defer to law enforcement. None of that is out of the ordinary.

A doctor without a trauma kit would be useless.


ICE do not have the legal authority to restrict municipal EMS from attending to a patient.


In fact, it is a crime to prevent EMS from attending a victim
Municipal EMS? It was someone on the street claiming to be a doctor.


ICE impeded both the doctor and the EMS


The doctor had a whistle, not a trauma kit. There was nothing they could do.

They didn’t block EMS, they had them walk into the scene. They did walk in. Sometimes EMS has to walk a ways.


Nobody knew that at the time. Doctors know where to apply pressure on arteries - in some cases this can save a life.

ICE people can't even pass open book tests.


Multiple GSWs aren’t treated simply by applying pressure.

Was the doctor a dermatologist, or a dentist?

He’s a GP.

By the way you can stop defending this ahole because your god king is now saying he made a mistake.