Reply to Roe v Wade struck down

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Roe v Wade struck down"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://twitter.com/PattyMurray/status/1810776361348538868[/twitter]

Zero reason for Senate Republicans to block this. [/quote]
Let’s examine the shifting platform of sand upon which the forced birthers stand.

First Roe was settled law, all six of the con justices swore so under oath.

Now Roe is gone.

Then it was “good! states’ rights!”

Two days after that Moscow Mitch signaled they’d happily take up a federal ban on abortion.

Then came the stories of women bleeding out in hospital parking lots or waiting at home to be sufficiently septic enough to qualify for an emergency abortion (nevermind the thousands condemned to carry pregnancies they didn’t want and children they couldn’t afford) and the forced birthers have gotten real quiet.

Then came the reports of increased neonatal and maternal mortality and there are few tepid “but LiFe!” posts, with most forced birthers quiet as they grave they want to push women into.

And now the GOP is signaling that women won’t be allowed to travel interstate.

The GOP wants women to stay at home, under the watchful eye of a man, any man, because any man making decisions is better than women deciding their own lives.

And near silence from the forced birthers. [/quote]

That's exactly what they've wanted all along. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics